1/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
Reference: 2018-37-INF-2718-v2
Target: Expediente
Date: 12.03.2019
Created by: CERT9
Revised by: CALIDAD
Approved by: TECNICO
CERTIFICATION REPORT
Dossier # 2018-37
TOE Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows (version 11.0.0. 6499 AES256)
Applicant 03654151A - Kaspersky Lab UK Ltd.
References
[EXT-4650] ETR v 1.0 Recertificación KE
Certification report of the product “Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows (version 11.0.0. 6499
AES256)”, as requested in [EXT-4376] dated 08-10-2018, and evaluated by the laboratory “Epoche
& Espri S.L.U.”, as detailed in the Evaluation Technical Report [EXT-4650] received on 27/12/2018.
2/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................4
TOE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................4
SECURITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.............................................................................................5
SECURITY FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS...........................................................................................6
IDENTIFICATION.....................................................................................................................................9
SECURITY POLICIES.................................................................................................................................9
ASSUMPTIONS AND OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT.............................................................................9
CLARIFICATIONS ON NON-COVERED THREATS..................................................................................9
OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FUNCTIONALITY .............................................................................10
ARCHITECTURE.....................................................................................................................................10
LOGICAL ARCHITECTURE ..................................................................................................................10
PHYSICAL ARCHITECTURE.................................................................................................................11
DOCUMENTS........................................................................................................................................11
PRODUCT TESTING...............................................................................................................................11
EVALUATED CONFIGURATION .............................................................................................................12
EVALUATION RESULTS .........................................................................................................................14
COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE EVALUATION TEAM...............................................14
CERTIFIER RECOMMENDATIONS .........................................................................................................14
GLOSSARY.............................................................................................................................................14
BIBLIOGRAPHY .....................................................................................................................................14
SECURITY TARGET / SECURITY TARGET LITE (IF APPLICABLE)..............................................................15
RECOGNITION AGREEMENTS...............................................................................................................16
European Recognition of ITSEC/CC – Certificates (SOGIS-MRA)......................................................16
International Recognition of CC – Certificates (CCRA).....................................................................16
3/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
4/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This document constitutes the Certification Report for the certification file of the product
“Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows (version 11.0.0. 6499 AES256)”.
The TOE is a software product, which provides the encryption of device data (user data, operation
system data), anti-virus and access control functionality.
Developer/manufacturer:
Kaspersky Lab AO
39A/2 Leningradskoe Shosse,
Moscow, 125212, Russia
Sponsor: Kaspersky Lab UK Ltd.
Certification Body: Centro Criptológico Nacional (CCN) del Centro Nacional de Inteligencia (CNI).
ITSEF: “Epoche & Espri S.L.U.”
Protection Profile:None.
Evaluation Level: EAL2+ALC_FLR.1.
Evaluation end date: 27/12/2018.
All the assurance components required by the evaluation level EAL2 (augmented with ALC_FLR.1)
have been assigned a “PASS” verdict. Consequently, the laboratory “Epoche & Espri S.L.U.” assigns
the “PASS” VERDICT to the whole evaluation due all the evaluator actions are satisfied for the EAL2
(augmented with ALC_FLR.1), as defined by Common Criteria v3.1 R5 and the CEM v3.1 R5.
Considering the obtained evidences during the instruction of the certification request of the
product “Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows (version 11.0.0. 6499 AES256)”, a positive
resolution is proposed.
TOE SUMMARY
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows combines world-class anti-malware with application
start-up control, device access control, and web access control, plus data encryption in a single
application.
Full Disk Encryption as part of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows functionality helps to
protect valuable business data from accidental loss due to lost or stolen devices. Kaspersky
understands that data loss can result in devastating consequences.
5/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows Encryption functionality provides a strong encryption
algorithm integrated in the endpoint protection suite that can be easily managed with a centralised
management console.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security consists of components, each of which is responsible for protection
against a particular type of threat. They can be organised into three groups covering main product
functionality:
1. Anti-Virus protection:
 File system protection
 Network protection and traffic scanning
 IM Antivirus
 Proactive Defense
2. Control:
 Application Startup Control
 Device Access Control
 Web Access Control
3. Encryption:
 Full Disk Encryption
 Removable Device Encryption (not a part of evaluation)
 File Level Encryption (not a part of evaluation)
4. Management of all above.
SECURITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The product was evaluated with all the evidence required to fulfil the evaluation level EAL2 and the
evidences required by the additional component ALC_FLR.1, according to Common Criteria v3.1 R5
and the CEM v3.1 R5.
Class Family/Component
ASE: Security Target
Evaluation
ASE_INT.1. ST Introduction
ASE.CCL.1. Conformance claims
ASE_SPD.1. Security problem definition
ASE_OBJ.2. Security objectives
ASE_ECD.1. Extended component definition
ASE_REQ.2. Derived security requirements
6/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
ASE_TSS.1. TOE summary specification
ADV: Development
ADV_ARC.1. Security architecture
ADV_FSP.2. Functional specification
ADV_TDS.1. TOE design
AGD: Guidance
documents
AGD_OPE.1. Operational user guidance
AGD_PRE.1. Preparative
procedures
ALC: Life cycle support
ALC_CMC.2. CM capabilities
ALC_CMS.2. CM Scope
ALC_DEL.1. Delivery
ALC_FLR.1. Flaw remediation
ATE: Tests
ATE_COV.1. Coverage
ATE_FUN.1. Functional tests
ATE_IND.2. Independent testing
AVA: Vulnerability
assessment
AVA_VAN.2. Vulnerability analysis
SECURITY FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
The product security functionality satisfies the following functional requirements, according to
Common Criteria v3.1 R5:
Class Component
FCS: Cryptographic
Support
FCS_CKM.1(1) Cryptographic key generation (DEK/MK)
FCS_CKM.1(2) Cryptographic key generation (User key)
FCS_CKM.4 Cryptographic key destruction
FCS_COP.1(1) Cryptographic operation (Data Encryption
/Decryption)
FCS_COP.1(2) Cryptographic operation (Key Encryption
7/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
/Decryption)
FCS_COP.1(3) Cryptographic operation (HMAC calculation)
FCS_COP.1(4) Cryptographic operation (RSA Key Encryption)
FDP: User Data
Protection
FDP_ACC.1(1) Subset access control (FDE)
FDP_ACC.1(2) Subset access control (ASC)
FDP_ACC.1(3) Subset access control (DAC)
FDP_IFC.1 Subset information flow control (WAC)
FDP_ACF.1(1) Security attribute based access control (FDE)
FDP_ACF.1(2) Security attribute based access control (ASC)
FDP_ACF.1(3) Security attribute based access control (DAC)
FDP_IFF.1 Simple security attributes (WAC)
FIA: Identification and
Authentication
FIA_UAU.2 User authentication before any action
FIA_UID.2 User identification before any action
FMT: Security
Management
FMT_MSA.1(1) Management of security attributes (FDE)
FMT_MSA.1(2) Management of security attributes (ASC)
FMT_MSA.1(3) Management of security attributes (DAC)
FMT_MSA.1(4) Management of security attributes (WAC)
FMT_MSA.3(1) Static attribute initialisation (FDE)
FMT_MSA.3(2) Static attribute initialisation (ASC)
FMT_MSA.3(3) Static attribute initialisation (DAC)
FMT_MSA.3(4) Static attribute initialisation (WAC)
FMT_MTD.1 Management of TSF data
FMT_SMF.1 Specification of management functions
FMT_SMR.1 Security roles
FAV: Anti-Virus
FAV_ACT.1 Anti-virus actions
FAV_ALR.1 Anti-virus alerts
FAV_SCN.1 Anti-virus scanning
8/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
9/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
IDENTIFICATION
Product: “Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows (version 11.0.0. 6499 AES256)”
Security Target: “Security Target for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows, version 1.05, July
2018”
Protection Profile: None.
Evaluation Level: Common Criteria v 3.1 R5 EAL2+ALC_FLR.1
SECURITY POLICIES
The use of the product “Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows (version 11.0.0. 6499 AES256)”
shall implement a set of security policies assuring the fulfilment of different standards and security
demands.
The detail of these policies is documented in the Security Target, section 3.3.
ASSUMPTIONS AND OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT
The following assumptions are constraints to the conditions used to assure the security properties
and functionalities compiled by the security target. These assumptions have been applied during
the evaluation in order to determine if the identified vulnerabilities can be exploited.
In order to assure the secure use of the TOE, it is necessary to start from these assumptions for its
operational environment. If this is not possible and any of them could not be assumed, it would not
be possible to assure the secure operation of the TOE.
The detail of these assumptions is documented in the Security Target, section 3.4.
CLARIFICATIONS ON NON-COVERED THREATS
The following threats do not suppose a risk for the product “Kaspersky Endpoint Security for
Windows (version 11.0.0. 6499 AES256)”, although the agents implementing attacks have the
attack potential according to the “Basic” attack potential of EAL2 and always fulfilling the usage
assumptions and the proper security policies satisfaction.
For any other threat not included in this list, the evaluation results of the product security
properties and the associated certificate, do not guarantee any resistance.
The threats covered by the security properties of the TOE are categorized below.
The detail of these threats is documented in the Security Target, section 3.2.
10/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FUNCTIONALITY
The product requires the cooperation from its operational environment to fulfil some of the
objectives of the defined security problem.
The detail of these security objectives for the TOE operational environment is documented in the
Security Target, section 4.2.
ARCHITECTURE
LOGICAL ARCHITECTURE
Kaspersky Endpoint Security consists of components, each of which is responsible for protection
against a particular type of threat. They can be organised into three groups covering main product
functionality:
1. Anti-Virus protection:
 File system protection
 Network protection and traffic scanning
 IM Antivirus
 Proactive Defense
2. Control:
 Application Startup Control
 Device Access Control
 Web Access Control
3. Encryption:
 Full Disk Encryption
 Removable Device Encryption (not a part of evaluation)
 File Level Encryption (not a part of evaluation)
4. Management of all above.
11/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
PHYSICAL ARCHITECTURE
DOCUMENTS
The product includes the following documents that shall be distributed and made available
together to the users of the evaluated version.
 [PRE105] Preparative Procedures for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows, version
1.05, June 2018
 [UMA105] Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows User Manual, Addendum A., version
1.05
 [UM105] Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows User Manual, Application version:
11.0.0. 6499, version 1.05
PRODUCT TESTING
The developer has executed test for all the security functions. All the tests have been performed by
the developer in its premises, with a satisfactory result.
12/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
During the evaluation process it has been verified each unit test checking that the security
functionality that covers is been identified and also that the kind of test is appropriate to the
function that is intended to test.
All the tests have been developed using the testing scenario appropriate to the established
architecture in the security target. It has also been checked that the obtained results during the
tests fit or correspond to the previously estimated results.
To verify the results of the developer tests, the evaluator has repeated all the developer functional
tests in the developer premises. Likewise, he has selected and repeated all of the developer
functional tests in the testing platform implemented in the evaluation laboratory.
In addition, the lab has devised a set of tests for each of the security functions of the product
verifying that the obtained results are consistent with the results obtained by the developer.
It has been checked that the obtained results conform to the expected results and, in the cases
where a deviation in respect to the expected results was present, the evaluator has confirmed that
this variation neither represents any security problem nor a decrease in the functional capacity of
the product.
EVALUATED CONFIGURATION
The software and hardware requirements, as well as the referenced options are indicated below.
The Full Disk Encryption of Kaspersky Endpoint Security under this evaluation is provided for the
following operating systems:
 Microsoft Windows 10 Professional x86 / x64;
 Microsoft Windows 10 Enterprise x86 / x64;
 Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise x86 / x64;
 Microsoft Windows 8.1 Pro x86 / х64;
 Microsoft Windows 8 Pro x86 / x64;
 Microsoft Windows 8 Enterprise x86 / x64;
 Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x86 / x64 SP1;
 Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise x86 / x64 SP1;
Kaspersky Endpoint Security – Full Disk Encryption works with the following file systems under
Windows: FAT, FAT32, and NTFS4.
Additional requirements for Full Disk Encryption Functionality:
 Different drives for the loader and the operating system are not supported.
 Basic disk partitions are supported. Dynamic disk partitions are not supported.
 At least 2 % of contiguous free disk space shall be available on the disk for encryption.
13/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
Regarding the hardware components, the TOE has to run on devices (usually personal computer
systems) with the following minimum requirements:
 Processor: Intel Core i3 Duo 3.10GHz or equivalent
 RAM: 2GB of free RAM or more
 HDD: 2GB of available hard disk space
 Network connection peripherals
Among all the possibilities offered by these software and hardware requirements, the configuration
selected for the evaluation is the following:
• PC with intel core i3 duo 3.10GHz or equivalent with 4GB RAM or more, running
Windows 10 enterprise 64 bits
• PC with intel core i3 duo 3.10GHz or equivalent with 8GB ram or more, running
Windows 2016 standard 64 bits and KSC 10.4.343 should be used for centralized
management.
• Computers should be connected to LAN.
The machines executing TOE's parts have been provisioned with the following hardware and
software fulfilling the requirements stated at operational environment:
KES11-EE-W10 – Workstation:
 X86-64 Compatible processor
 8GB of RAM
 40GB of persistence storage
 Microsoft Windows 10 Enterprise
 Including Kaspersky Endpoint Security 11 for Windows with Full Disk Encryption (version
11.0.0. 6499 AES256)
KSC-EE-W2016 – Windows server:
 X86-64 Compatible processor
 8GB of RAM
 40GB of persistence
 Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Version 1607
14/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
 Including Kaspersky Security Center (KSC)
EVALUATION RESULTS
The product “Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows (version 11.0.0. 6499 AES256)” has been
evaluated against the Security Target for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows, version 1.05,
July 2018.
All the assurance components required by the evaluation level EAL2 (augmented with ALC_FLR.1)
have been assigned a “PASS” verdict. Consequently, the laboratory “Epoche & Espri S.L.U.” assigns
the “PASS” VERDICT to the whole evaluation due all the evaluator actions are satisfied for the
evaluation level EAL2 (augmented with ALC_FLR.1), as defined by Common Criteria v3.1 R5 and the
CEM v3.1 R5.
COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE EVALUATION TEAM
Next, recommendations regarding the secure usage of the TOE are provided. These have been
collected along the evaluation process and are detailed to be considered when using the product.
Regarding the virus detection functionality, the TOE is able to detect a set of “Known malware”
specified in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows - User Manual. Addendum A version 1.05
[UMA105]. This document states the list of malware objects the TOE is able to detect
CERTIFIER RECOMMENDATIONS
Considering the obtained evidences during the instruction of the certification request of the
product “Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows (version 11.0.0. 6499 AES256)”, a positive
resolution is proposed.
GLOSSARY
CCN Centro Criptológico Nacional
CNI Centro Nacional de Inteligencia
EAL Evaluation Assurance Level
ETR Evaluation Technical Report
OC Organismo de Certificación
TOE Target Of Evaluation
BIBLIOGRAPHY
The following standards and documents have been used for the evaluation of the product:
15/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
[CC_P1] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 1: Introduction and
general model, Version 3.1, R5 Final, April 2017.
[CC_P2] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 2: Security functional
components, Version 3.1, R5 Final, April 2017.
[CC_P3] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 3: Security assurance
components, Version 3.1, R5 Final, April 2017.
[CEM] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation: Version 3.1, R5 Final,
April 2017.
[CCDB-2006-04-004] ST sanitising for publication, April 2006.
SECURITY TARGET / SECURITY TARGET LITE (IF APPLICABLE)
Along with this certification report, the complete security target of the evaluation is available in the
Certification Body:
- Security Target for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows, version 1.05, July 2018.
The public version of this document constitutes the ST Lite. The ST Lite has also been reviewed for
the needs of publication according to [CCDB-2006-04-004], and it is published along with this
certification report in the Certification Body and CCRA websites. The ST Lite identifier is:
- Sanitized Security Target for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Windows version 1.06, July
2018.
16/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
RECOGNITION AGREEMENTS
In order to avoid multiple certification of the same product in different countries a mutual
recognition of IT security certificates - as far as such certificates are based on ITSEC or CC - under
certain conditions was agreed.
European Recognition of ITSEC/CC – Certificates (SOGIS-MRA)
The SOGIS-Mutual Recognition Agreement (SOGIS-MRA) Version 3 became effective in April 2010. It
defines the recognition of certificates for IT-Products at a basic recognition level and, in addition, at
higher recognition levels for IT-Products related to certain SOGIS Technical Domains only.
The basic recognition level includes Common Criteria (CC) Evaluation Assurance Levels EAL 1 to EAL
4 and ITSEC Evaluation Assurance Levels E1 to E3 (basic). For "Smartcards and similar devices" a
SOGIS Technical Domain is in place. For "HW Devices with Security Boxes" a SOGIS Technical
Domains is in place, too. In addition, certificates issued for Protection Profiles based on Common
Criteria are part of the recognition agreement.
The new agreement has been signed by several national bodies. The current list of signatory
nations and approved certification schemes, details on recognition, and the history of the
agreement can be seen on the website at https://www.sogisportal.eu.
The SOGIS-MRA logo printed on the certificate indicates that it is recognised under the terms of this
agreement by the nations listed above.
This certificate is recognized under SOGIS-MRA for all assurance components selected.
International Recognition of CC – Certificates (CCRA)
The international arrangement on the mutual recognition of certificates based on the CC (Common
Criteria Recognition Arrangement, CCRA-2014) has been ratified on 08 September 2014. It covers
CC certificates based on collaborative Protection Profiles (cPP) (exact use), CC certificates based on
assurance components up to and including EAL 2 or the assurance family Flaw Remediation
(ALC_FLR) and CC certificates for Protection Profiles and for collaborative Protection Profiles (cPP).
The CCRA-2014 replaces the old CCRA signed in May 2000 (CCRA-2000). Certificates based on CCRA-
2000, issued before 08 September 2014 are still under recognition according to the rules of CCRA-
2000. For on 08 September 2014 ongoing certification procedures and for Assurance Continuity
(maintenance and re-certification) of old certificates a transition period on the recognition of
certificates according to the rules of CCRA-2000 (i.e. assurance components up to and including EAL
4 or the assurance family Flaw Remediation (ALC_FLR)) is defined until 08 September 2017.
As of September 2014 the signatories of the new CCRA-2014 are government representatives from
the following nations: Australia, Austria, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, The Netherlands, New Zealand,
17/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
Norway, Pakistan, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom, and the
United States.
The current list of signatory nations and approved certification schemes can be seen on the
website: http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org.
The Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement logo printed on the certificate indicates that this
certification is recognised under the terms of this agreement by the nations listed above.