TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V. Headoffice: Westervoortsedijk 73 NL-6827 AV Arnhem P.O. Box 2220 NL-6802 CE Arnhem The Netherlands Location Leek: Eiberkamp 10 NL-9351 VT Leek P.O. Box 37 NL-9350 AA Leek The Netherlands info@nl.tuv.com www.tuv.com/nl Tel. +31 (0)88 888 7 888 Fax +31 (0)88 888 7 879 TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V. is a registered company at the Dutch Chamber of Commerce under number 27288788 VAT number: NL815820380B01 IBAN: NL61DEUT0265155096 Version 2018-1 ® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Any use or application requires prior approval. Certification Report IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration) Sponsor and developer: IDEMIA 18, Chaussée Jules César 95520 Osny France Evaluation facility: Brightsight Brassersplein 2 2612 CT Delft The Netherlands Report number: NSCIB-CC-180351-CR2 Report version: 2 Project number: 180351 Author(s): Wouter Slegers Date: 18 February 2019 Number of pages: 14 Number of appendices: 0 Reproduction of this report is authorized provided the report is reproduced in its entirety. Page: 3/14 of report number: NSCIB-CC-180351-CR2, dated 18 February 2019 ® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Any use or application requires prior approval. CONTENTS: Foreword 4 Recognition of the certificate 5 International recognition 5 European recognition 5 1 Executive Summary 6 2 Certification Results 8 2.1 Identification of Target of Evaluation 8 2.2 Security Policy 8 2.3 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope 8 2.4 Architectural Information 9 2.5 Documentation 9 2.6 IT Product Testing 10 2.7 Re-used evaluation results 11 2.8 Evaluated Configuration 11 2.9 Results of the Evaluation 11 2.10 Comments/Recommendations 11 3 Security Target 13 4 Definitions 13 5 Bibliography 14 Page: 4/14 of report number: NSCIB-CC-180351-CR2, dated 18 February 2019 ® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Any use or application requires prior approval. Foreword The Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the Area of IT Security (NSCIB) provides a third-party evaluation and certification service for determining the trustworthiness of Information Technology (IT) security products. Under this NSCIB, TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V. has the task of issuing certificates for IT security products, as well as for protection profiles and sites. Part of the procedure is the technical examination (evaluation) of the product, protection profile or site according to the Common Criteria assessment guidelines published by the NSCIB. Evaluations are performed by an IT Security Evaluation Facility (ITSEF) under the oversight of the NSCIB Certification Body, which is operated by TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V. in cooperation with the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. An ITSEF in the Netherlands is a commercial facility that has been licensed by TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V. to perform Common Criteria evaluations; a significant requirement for such a license is accreditation to the requirements of ISO Standard 17025 “General requirements for the accreditation of calibration and testing laboratories”. By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V. asserts that the product or site complies with the security requirements specified in the associated (site) security target, or that the protection profile (PP) complies with the requirements for PP evaluation specified in the Common Criteria for Information Security Evaluation. A (site) security target is a requirements specification document that defines the scope of the evaluation activities. The consumer should review the (site) security target or protection profile, in addition to this certification report, in order to gain an understanding of any assumptions made during the evaluation, the IT product's intended environment, its security requirements, and the level of confidence (i.e., the evaluation assurance level) that the product or site satisfies the security requirements stated in the (site) security target. Reproduction of this report is authorized provided the report is reproduced in its entirety. Page: 5/14 of report number: NSCIB-CC-180351-CR2, dated 18 February 2019 ® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Any use or application requires prior approval. Recognition of the certificate Presence of the Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement and SOG-IS logos on the certificate indicates that this certificate is issued in accordance with the provisions of the CCRA and the SOG-IS agreement and will be recognised by the participating nations. International recognition The CCRA has been signed by the Netherlands in May 2000 and provides mutual recognition of certificates based on the CC. Starting September 2014 the CCRA has been updated to provide mutual recognition of certificates based on cPPs (exact use) or STs with evaluation assurance components up to and including EAL2+ALC_FLR. The current list of signatory nations and approved certification schemes can be found on: http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org. European recognition The European SOGIS-Mutual Recognition Agreement (SOGIS-MRA) version 3 effective from April 2010 provides mutual recognition of Common Criteria and ITSEC certificates at a basic evaluation level for all products. A higher recognition level for evaluation levels beyond EAL4 (resp. E3-basic) is provided for products related to specific technical domains. This agreement was initially signed by Finland, France, Germany, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Italy joined the SOGIS-MRA in December 2010. The current list of signatory nations, approved certification schemes and the list of technical domains for which the higher recognition applies can be found on: http://www.sogisportal.eu. Page: 6/14 of report number: NSCIB-CC-180351-CR2, dated 18 February 2019 ® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Any use or application requires prior approval. 1 Executive Summary This Certification Report states the outcome of the Common Criteria security evaluation of the IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration). The developer of the IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration) is IDEMIA located in Osny, France and they also act as the sponsor of the evaluation and certification. A Certification Report is intended to assist prospective consumers when judging the suitability of the IT security properties of the product for their particular requirements. The Target of Evaluation (TOE) is a contact and contactless chip of a machine readable travel document (MRTD) based on the requirements and recommendations of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), EU requirements for biometric European passport and Biometric European Resident Permit. This product is intended to enable verification of the authenticity of the travel document and to identify its holder during a border control, using an inspection system. The verification process is based on Extended Access Control with Password Authenticated Connection Establishment (PACE), Chip Authentication v1, Terminal Authentication v1 and optionally Active Authentication (AA). The TOE may also be used as an ISO driving license, compliant to ISO/IEC 18013 or ISO/IEC TR 19446 supporting AA, as both applications (MRTD and IDL) share the same protocols and data structure organization. The TOE also supports the Polymorphic eMRTD according to Polymorphic eMRTD Specification by the Dutch National Office for Identity Data (written by IDEMIA), allowing Polymorphic Authentication with Randomization of the Polymorphic Pseudonym, Polymorphic Identity and Polymorphic Complementary ID attributes. The TOE has been originally evaluated by Brightsight B.V. located in Delft, The Netherlands and was certified on 2018-06-26. The re-evaluation also took place by Brightsight B.V. and was completed on 2019-02-18 with the approval of the ETR. The re-certification procedure has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the Area of IT Security [NSCIB]. This second issue of the Certification Report is a result of a “recertification with major changes”. The major changes are an addition of an extra patch level (PL4) for the underlying platform, and the addition of delivery of the TOE with the applet in ROM. The security evaluation re-used the evaluation results of previously performed evaluations. A full, up to date vulnerability analysis has been made, reusing existing penetration testing and renewed functional testing. The scope of the evaluation is defined by the security target [ST], which identifies assumptions made during the evaluation, the intended environment for the IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration), the security requirements, and the level of confidence (evaluation assurance level) at which the product is intended to satisfy the security requirements. Consumers of the IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration) are advised to verify that their own environment is consistent with the security target, and to give due consideration to the comments, observations and recommendations in this certification report. The results documented in the evaluation technical report [ETR] 1 for this product provide sufficient evidence that the TOE meets the EAL5 augmented (EAL5+) assurance requirements for the evaluated security functionality. This assurance level is augmented with ALC_DVS.2 and AVA_VAN.5. The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 5 [CEM], for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, version 3.1 Revision 5 [CC]. TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V., as the NSCIB Certification Body, declares that the evaluation meets all the conditions for international recognition of Common Criteria Certificates and that the product will 1 The Evaluation Technical Report contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the evaluator, and is not releasable for public review. Page: 7/14 of report number: NSCIB-CC-180351-CR2, dated 18 February 2019 ® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Any use or application requires prior approval. be listed on the NSCIB Certified Products list. It should be noted that the certification results only apply to the specific version of the product as evaluated. Page: 8/14 of report number: NSCIB-CC-180351-CR2, dated 18 February 2019 ® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Any use or application requires prior approval. 2 Certification Results 2.1 Identification of Target of Evaluation The Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this evaluation is the IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration) from IDEMIA located in Osny, France. The TOE is comprised of the following main components: TOE delivery item Hardware/software/Document components Identification IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration) Software applet: IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection applet 7126-9301-0311-02.03.00.0014 (applet build.0.14 in EEPROM of JCOP platform) 7126-9301-0319-02.03.00.0014 (applet build 0.14 in ROM of JCOP platform) NXP JCOP 3 P60 certified by the Dutch certification body (NSCIB CC- 18-98209/2) on 29-11-2018 JxHyyy0019790400 (JCOP platform ID) Patch level: 0x00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 (PL0) or 0x04 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 (PL4) Crypto Library V3.1.x on P6022y VB certified by the Dutch certification body (NSCIB CC-18-67206) on 31-05-2018 NXP Secure Smart Card Controller P6022y VB including IC Dedicated Software certified by the German certification body (BSI-DSZ-CC-1059- 2018) on 18-05-2018 Key set Electronic document n.a To ensure secure usage a set of guidance documents is provided together with the IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration). Details can be found in section 2.5 of this report. (Note that the guidance is only delivered via the Haarlem site.) For a detailed and precise description of the TOE lifecycle refer to the [ST], section 1.4.3. 2.2 Security Policy The Target of Evaluation (TOE) is a contactless or contact based integrated circuit chip of machine readable travel documents (MRTD) and provides the Extended Access Control according to ‘ICAO Doc 9303’ as well as optional Active Authentication according to ‘ICAO Doc 9303’ if enabled during the personalization. The communication between terminal and chip shall be protected by Password Authenticated Connection Establishment (PACE), optionally with Chip Authentication Mapping (PACE CAM) according to Electronic Passport Standards using the Standard Inspection Procedure with PACE (PACE PP), BSI-CC-PP-0068-V2 [PACE-PP]. Polymorphic eMRTD extensions are present on the TOE that enable secure authentication with enhanced privacy protection features. It provides the holder the possibility to authenticate towards a service provider in a non-traceable and non-linkable manner thanks to usage of Polymorphic Pseudonyms and other Polymorphic ID attributes. 2.3 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope 2.3.1 Assumptions The assumptions defined in the Security Target are not covered by the TOE itself. These aspects lead to specific Security Objectives to be fulfilled by the TOE-Environment. Detailed information on these Page: 9/14 of report number: NSCIB-CC-180351-CR2, dated 18 February 2019 ® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Any use or application requires prior approval. security objectives that must be fulfilled by the TOE environment can be found in section 4.2 of the [ST]. 2.3.2 Clarification of scope The evaluation did not reveal any threats to the TOE that are not countered by the evaluated security functions of the product. Note that the ICAO MRTD infrastructure critically depends on the objectives for the environment to be met. These are not weaknesses of this particular TOE, but aspects of the ICAO MRTD infrastructure as a whole. The environment in which the TOE is personalized must perform proper and safe personalization according to the guidance and referred ICAO guidelines. The environment in which the TOE is used must ensure that the inspection system protects the confidentiality and integrity of the data send and read from the TOE. 2.4 Architectural Information The TOE consists of: •The MRTD’s chip circuitry and the IC dedicated software forming the Smart Card Platform (Hardware Platform and Hardware Abstraction Layer); •The IC embedded software running on the Smart Card Platform consisting of o Java Card virtual machine, ensuring language-level security; o Java Card runtime environment, providing additional security features for Java card technology enabled devices; o Java card API, providing access to card’s resources for the Applet; o Global Platform Card Manager, responsible for management of Applets on the card; o Mifare implementation can be enabled or disabled for this TOE. o Crypto Library •The eMRTD Applet Layer is the IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration) Applet. 2.5 Documentation The following documentation is provided with the product by the developer to the customer: TOE delivery item Hardware/software/Document components Identification [AGD_OPE] Operational guidance document with identification 2017_2000032685 Revision 2.1 [AGD_PRE] Preparatory guidance document with identification 2017_2000032686 Revision 2.7 Page: 10/14 of report number: NSCIB-CC-180351-CR2, dated 18 February 2019 ® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Any use or application requires prior approval. 2.6 IT Product Testing Testing (depth, coverage, functional tests, independent testing): The evaluators examined the developer’s testing activities documentation and verified that the developer has met their testing responsibilities. 2.6.1 Testing approach and depth The developer has performed extensive testing on functional specification, subsystem and module level. All parameter choices have been addressed at least once. All boundary cases identified have been tested explicitly, and additionally the near-boundary conditions have been covered. The testing was largely automated using industry standard and proprietary test suites. Test scripts were extensively used to verify that the commands return the expected values. The underlying hardware, crypto-library and Javacard test results are extendable to composite evaluations, as the underlying platform is operated according to its guidance and the composite evaluation requirements are met. For the testing performed by the evaluators, the developer has provided samples and a test environment. The evaluators have reproduced a selection of the developer tests, as well as a small number of test cases designed by the evaluator. 2.6.2 Independent Penetration Testing The penetration tests are devised after performing the Evaluator Vulnerability Analysis. The reference for attack techniques to which smart card-based devices such as the TOE must be protected against is the document named "Attack methods for smart cards" and referenced as [JIL-AP]. The susceptibility of the TOE to these attacks has been analysed in a white box investigation. The methodical analysis performed was conducted along the following steps: 1. When evaluating the evidence in the classes ASE, ADV and AGD potential vulnerabilities were identified from generating questions to the type of TOE and the specified behaviour. 2. A couple of detailed code reviews were performed on increasing versions of the implementation representation of the TOE, identified potential vulnerabilities were addressed. 3. An attack oriented analysis was performed according to the attack list in [JIL-AP]. For each of the attacks assurance for protection against the attacks was analysed using the knowledge gained from all evaluation classes. An important source for assurance against attacks in this step is the [JC-ETRfC] of the underlying platform. No additional potential vulnerabilities were concluded from this step. 4. All potential vulnerabilities were analysed for their protection using the total of the knowledge gained from all evaluation classes and the review on the implementation representation. It was concluded that for each of the potential vulnerabilities the TOE is protected such that the attack is not practical. 5. In a next step choices were made for penetration testing. Because no suspicion remained for potential vulnerabilities a choice for penetration testing was made to verify resistance against perturbation attacks for PMA functionality. Two perturbation attacks were tested, with light and EMFI perturbation, for two weeks, re-used from the previous evaluation. 2.6.3 Test Configuration The TOE has been tested in pre-personalisation, personalisation and operational life-cycle states with applet instance configurations specified in the Security Target [ST] section 1.4.2. 2.6.4 Testing Results The testing activities, including configurations, procedures, test cases, expected results and observed results are summarised in the [ETR], with references to the documents containing the full details. The developer’s tests and the independent functional tests produced the expected results, giving assurance that the TOE behaves as specified in its [ST] and functional specification. No exploitable vulnerabilities were found with the independent penetration tests. Page: 11/14 of report number: NSCIB-CC-180351-CR2, dated 18 February 2019 ® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Any use or application requires prior approval. The algorithmic security level of cryptographic functionality has not been rated in this certification process, but the current consensus on the algorithmic security level in the open domain, i.e. from the current best cryptanalytic attacks published, has been taken into account. The algorithmic security level exceeds 100 bits for all evaluated cryptographic functionality as required for high attack potential (AVA_VAN.5). The strength of the implementation of the cryptographic functionality has been assessed in the evaluation, as part of the AVA_VAN activities. No exploitable vulnerabilities were found with the independent penetration tests. 2.7 Re-used evaluation results In December 2018 and January 2019 a re-evaluation has been conducted for minor changes made to the TOE. In this re-evaluation the vulnerability analysis and evaluator independent testing have been renewed. It was concluded that all conclusions for the base evaluation are still applicable to the new changed TOE. There has been extensive re-use of the ALC aspects for the sites involved in the development and production of the TOE, by use of 5 site re-use report approaches for: •IDEMIA site in Osny R&D (development) •IDEMIA site in Meyreuil R&D (development) •IDEMIA site in Noida R&D (development) •IDEMIA site in Haarlem (development and production) •IDEMIA site in Noida plant (production) No sites have been visited as part of this evaluation. 2.8 Evaluated Configuration The TOE is defined uniquely by its name and version number IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration). The guidance documents describe how to verify the TOE and configure it. 2.9 Results of the Evaluation The evaluation lab documented their evaluation results in the [ETR] 2 which references an ASE Intermediate Report and other evaluator documents. The verdict of each claimed assurance requirement is “Pass”. Based on the above evaluation results the evaluation lab concluded the IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration), to be CC Part 2 extended, CC Part 3 conformant, and to meet the requirements of EAL 5 augmented with ALC_DVS.2 and AVA_VAN.5. This implies that the product satisfies the security requirements specified in Security Target [ST]. The Security Target claims ’strict’ conformance to the Protection Profile [PACE-PP] and [EACPP-V2]. 2.10 Comments/Recommendations The user guidance as outlined in section 2.5 contains necessary information about the usage of the TOE. Certain aspects of the TOE’s security functionality, in particular the countermeasures against attacks, depend on accurate conformance to the user guidance. There are no particular obligations or recommendations for the user apart from following the user guidance. In addition all aspects of assumptions, threats and policies as outlined in the Security Target not covered by the TOE itself need to be fulfilled by the operational environment of the TOE. 2 The Evaluation Technical Report contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the evaluator, and is not releasable for public review. Page: 12/14 of report number: NSCIB-CC-180351-CR2, dated 18 February 2019 ® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Any use or application requires prior approval. The customer or user of the product shall consider the results of the certification within his system risk management process. In order for the evolution of attack methods and techniques to be covered, he should define the period of time until a re-assessment for the TOE is required and thus requested from the sponsor of the certificate. The strength of the cryptographic algorithms and protocols was not rated in the course of this evaluation. This specifically applies to any proprietary or non-standard algorithms or protocols that use the Polymorphic Authentication functionality. To fend off attackers with high attack potential appropriate cryptographic algorithms with adequate key lengths must be used (references can be found in national and international documents and standards). Note that the same TOE in BAC and optional AA Configuration has been re-certified under ID NSCIB- CC-180045. Note also that the guidance of this TOE and the underlying platform must be followed for any other application added to this TOE. Page: 13/14 of report number: NSCIB-CC-180351-CR2, dated 18 February 2019 ® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Any use or application requires prior approval. 3 Security Target The Security Target IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration), Ref:2017_2000032696, version 1.6, 10/12/2018. [ST] is included here by reference. Please note that for the need of publication a public version [ST-lite] has been created and verified according to [ST-SAN]. 4 Definitions This list of Acronyms and the glossary of terms contains elements that are not already defined by the CC or CEM: ICAO International Civil Aviation Organisation IT Information Technology ITSEF IT Security Evaluation Facility JIL Joint Interpretation Library MRTD Machine readable travel document MRZ Machine readable zone NSCIB Netherlands scheme for certification in the area of IT security PP Protection Profile TOE Target of Evaluation Page: 14/14 of report number: NSCIB-CC-180351-CR2, dated 18 February 2019 ® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Any use or application requires prior approval. 5 Bibliography This section lists all referenced documentation used as source material in the compilation of this report: [EACPP-V2] Protection Profile Machine Readable Travel Document with ICAO Application, Extended Access Control with PACE (EAC PP) BSI-CC-PP-0056-V2-2012, Version 1.3.2, 5th December 2012. [CC] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Parts I, II and III, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017. [CEM] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017. [ETR] Evaluation Technical Report IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection EAL5+ (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration), document reference 18-RPT-329, version 6.0, dated 14 February 2019. [JC-ETRfC] Evaluation Technical Report for Composition NXP JCOP 3 P60 – EAL5+, report number 17-RPT-308, version 7.0, 26 October 2018. [JIL-AP] JIL, (Mandatory) Application of Attack Potential to Smartcards, Version 2.9, January 2013. [NSCIB] Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the Area of IT Security, Version 2.4, 27 September 2017. [PACE-PP] Protection Profile Machine Readable Travel Document using Standard Inspection Procedure with PACE, BSI-CC-PP-0068-V2-MA-01, Version 1.0.1, 22 July 2014, BSI. [ST] Security Target IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration), Ref:2017_2000032696, version 1.6, 10/12/2018. [ST-lite] Security Target Lite IDeal Pass v2.3-n JC with Privacy Protection (SAC/EAC/Polymorphic eMRTD Configuration), Ref:2018_2000036361, version 1.1, 30/01/2019. [ST-SAN] ST sanitising for publication, CC Supporting Document CCDB-2006-04-004, April 2006. (This is the end of this report).