1/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
Reference: 2018-20-INF-4155- v1
Target: Limitada al expediente
Date: 18.09.2023
Created by: CERT11
Revised by: CALIDAD
Approved by: TECNICO
CERTIFICATION REPORT
Dossier # 2018-20
TOE SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document SSCD Application version 4
Applicant IT12845840151 - HID Global
References
[EXT-4075] Certification Request
[EXT-8601] Evaluation Technical Report
Certification report of the product SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document SSCD
Application version 4, as requested in [EXT-4075], and evaluated by Applus Laboratories, as detailed
in the Evaluation Technical Report [EXT-8601] received on 05/07/2023.
2/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 3
TOE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................ 4
SECURITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................... 5
SECURITY FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS......................................................................................... 5
IDENTIFICATION.................................................................................................................................. 6
SECURITY POLICIES.............................................................................................................................. 6
ASSUMPTIONS AND OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................... 6
CLARIFICATIONS ON NON-COVERED THREATS................................................................................ 6
OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FUNCTIONALITY ............................................................................. 7
ARCHITECTURE.................................................................................................................................... 7
LOGICAL SCOPE ............................................................................................................................... 7
PHYSICAL SCOPE.............................................................................................................................. 8
DOCUMENTS..................................................................................................................................... 10
PRODUCT TESTING............................................................................................................................ 11
PENETRATION TESTING ................................................................................................................. 11
EVALUATED CONFIGURATION .......................................................................................................... 12
EVALUATION RESULTS ...................................................................................................................... 12
COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE EVALUATION TEAM ............................................. 13
CERTIFIER RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................................................... 13
GLOSSARY ......................................................................................................................................... 13
BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................................. 14
SECURITY TARGET / SECURITY TARGET LITE...................................................................................... 15
RECOGNITION AGREEMENTS............................................................................................................ 16
European Recognition of ITSEC/CC – Certificates (SOGIS-MRA).................................................... 16
International Recognition of CC – Certificates (CCRA)................................................................... 16
3/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This document constitutes the Certification Report for the certification file of the product SOMA-
c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document SSCD Application version 4.
Developer/manufacturer: HID Global
Sponsor: HID Global.
Certification Body: Centro Criptológico Nacional (CCN).
ITSEF: Applus Laboratories.
Protection Profile: Protection profiles for secure signature creation device – Part 2: Device with key
generation, v2.0.1, January 2012, BSI-CC-PP-0059-2009-MA-01.
Protection profiles for secure signature creation device – Part 4: Extension for device with key
generation and trusted communication with certificate generation application, v1.0.1, November
2012, BSI-CC-PP-0071-2012.
Protection profiles for secure signature creation device – Part 5: Extension for device with key
generation and trusted communication with signature creation application, v1.0.1, November 2012,
BSI-CC-PP-0072-2012.
Evaluation Level: Common Criteria version 3.1 R5 - EAL5 + ALC_DVS.2 + AVA_VAN.5.
Evaluation end date: 07/07/2023.
Expiration Date1
: 15/09/2028.
All the assurance components required by the evaluation level EAL5 (augmented with ALC_DVS.2
and AVA_VAN.5) have been assigned a “PASS” verdict. Consequently, the laboratory Applus
Laboratories assigns the “PASS” VERDICT to the whole evaluation due all the evaluator actions are
satisfied for the EAL5 + ALC_DVS.2 + AVA_VAN.5, as defined by the Common Criteria version 3.1 R5
and the CEM version 3.1 R5.
Considering the obtained evidences during the instruction of the certification request of the
product SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document SSCD Application version 4, a positive
resolution is proposed.
1
This date refers to the expiration date of the certificate recognition within the scope of the mutual recognition
arrangements signed by this Certification Body.
4/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
TOE SUMMARY
The TOE is a combination of hardware and software configured to securely create, use, and manage
Signature Creation Data (SCD). The SSCD protects the SCD during its whole life cycle as to be used in
a signature creation process solely by its Signatory.
The TOE comprises all IT security functionality necessary to ensure the secrecy of the SCD and the
security of the electronic signature.
The TOE provides the following functions:
1. to generate Signature Creation Data (SCD) and the corresponding Signature Verification
Data (SVD),
2. to export the SVD for certification to the CGA over a trusted channel,
3. to prove the identity as SSCD to external entities,
4. to, optionally, receive and store certificate info,
5. to switch the SSCD from a non-operational state to an operational state, and
6. if in an operational state, to create digital signatures for data with the following steps:
a. select an SCD if multiple are present in the SSCD,
b. authenticate the Signatory and determine its intent to sign,
c. receive data to be signed or a unique representation thereof (DTBS/R) from the SCA
over a trusted channel,
d. apply an appropriate cryptographic signature creation function to the DTBS/R using
the selected SCD.
The TOE is prepared for the Signatory’s use by:
1. generating at least one SCD/SVD pair, and
2. personalizing for the Signatory by storing in the TOE:
a. the Signatory’s Reference Authentication Data (RAD),
b. optionally, certificate info for at least one SCD in the TOE.
After preparation, the SCD shall be in a non-operational state. Upon receiving a TOE, the Signatory
shall verify its non-operational state and change the SCD state to operational.
After preparation, the intended legitimate user should be informed of the Signatory’s Verification
Authentication Data (VAD) required for use of the TOE in signing. The means of providing this
information is expected to protect the confidentiality and the integrity of the corresponding
Reference Authentication Data (RAD).
5/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
If the use of an SCD is no longer required, then it shall be destroyed.
SECURITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The product was evaluated with all the evidence required to fulfil the evaluation level EAL5 and the
evidences required by the additional components ALC_DVS.2 and AVA_VAN.5, according to
Common Criteria v3.1 R5.
ASSURANCE CLASS ASSURANCE COMPONENT
ASE ASE_CCL.1
ASE_ECD.1
ASE_INT.1
ASE_OBJ.2
ASE_REQ.2
ASE_SPD.1
ASE.TSS.1
ADV ADV_ARC.1
ADV_FSP.5
ADV_IMP.1
ADV_INT.2
ADV_TDS.4
AGD AGD_OPE.1
AGD_PRE.1
ALC ALC_CMC.4
ALC_CMS.5
ALC_DEL.1
ALC_DVS.2
ALC_LCD.1
ALC_TAT.2
ATE ATE_COV.2
ATE_DPT.3
ATE_FUN.1
ATE_IND.2
AVA AVA_VAN.5
SECURITY FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
The product security functionality satisfies the functional requirements, according to Common
Criteria v3.1 R5, Part 2 extended and can be found in section 6 Security Requirements of the [ST].
6/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
IDENTIFICATION
Product: SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document SSCD Application version 4
Security Target: TCAE180037 - SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document - Security
Target SSCD Application - Recertification, version 1.4, 18.10.2022.
Protection Profile: Protection profiles for secure signature creation device – Part 2: Device with key
generation, v2.0.1, January 2012, BSI-CC-PP-0059-2009-MA-01.
Protection profiles for secure signature creation device – Part 4: Extension for device with key
generation and trusted communication with certificate generation application, v1.0.1, November
2012, BSI-CC-PP-0071-2012.
Protection profiles for secure signature creation device – Part 5: Extension for device with key
generation and trusted communication with signature creation application, v1.0.1, November 2012,
BSI-CC-PP-0072-2012.
Evaluation Level: Common Criteria version 3.1 R5 - EAL5 + ALC_DVS.2 + AVA_VAN.5.
SECURITY POLICIES
The use of the product SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document SSCD Application
version 4 shall implement a set of security policies assuring the fulfilment of different standards and
security demands.
The detail of these policies is documented in the Security Target, section 4.3 Organizational Security
Policies.
ASSUMPTIONS AND OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT
The following assumptions are constraints to the conditions used to assure the security properties
and functionalities compiled by the security target. These assumptions have been applied during
the evaluation in order to determine if the identified vulnerabilities can be exploited.
In order to assure the secure use of the TOE, it is necessary to start from these assumptions for its
operational environment. If this is not possible and any of them could not be assumed, it would not
be possible to assure the secure operation of the TOE.
The detail of these assumptions is documented in the Security Target, section 4.4 Assumptions.
CLARIFICATIONS ON NON-COVERED THREATS
The following threats do not suppose a risk for the product SOMA-c007 Machine Readable
Electronic Document SSCD Application version 4, although the agents implementing attacks have a
High attack potential according to the assurance level of EAL5 + ALC_DVS.2 + AVA_VAN.5 and
always fulfilling the usage assumptions and the proper security policies satisfaction.
7/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
For any other threat not included in this list, the evaluation results of the product security
properties and the associated certificate, do not guarantee any resistance.
The threats covered by the security properties of the TOE are those defined in the Security Target,
section 4.2 Threats.
OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FUNCTIONALITY
The product requires the cooperation from its operational environment to fulfil some of the
objectives of the defined security problem.
The security objectives declared for the TOE operational environment are those defined in the
Protection Profile and they are documented in the Security Target, section 5.2 Security Objectives
for the operational Environment.
ARCHITECTURE
LOGICAL SCOPE
The SSCD application of the TOE supports the same SSCD life cycle phases, i.e. SSCD preparation
and SSCD operational use, as well as the same SSCD roles, i.e. Administrator and Signatory, as those
defined in the PPs [PP-0059] [PP-0071] [PP-072].
The following figure illustrates the operations supported by the SSCD application of the TOE, split
according to the SSCD life cycle phases and the SSCD roles for which they are actually available.
8/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
PHYSICAL SCOPE
The TOE is comprised of the following parts:
• dual-interface chip Infineon M7892 G12 equipped with IC Dedicated Software (cf. [ST]
Appendix A for more details);
• smart card operating system SOMA-c007 version 4;
• a Secure Signature Creation Device (SSCD) application compliant with Commission
Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/650 [2016/650/EU] and the Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
[910/2014/EU], repealing the European Parliament Directive 1999/93/EC [1999/93/EU]
• guidance documentation about the initialization of the TOE and the preparation and use of
the SSCD application, composed by:
o the Initialization Guidance,
o the Pre-personalization Guidance,
o the Personalization Guidance,
o the Operational User Guidance.
The following table describes the format, delivery method, recipients and the hash value of each
TOE components.
Type
TOE
component
For
mat
Delivery
method
Delivery
recipient
HASH VALUE
(SHA-512)
IC with
Dedicated
Software
and Crypto
Library
M7892 G12
Mod
ule
on
chip
Secure
courier
-
CF. [M7892], SECTION
10
OS and ICAO
Application
SOMA-c007
version 4
Machine
Readable
Electronic
Document
(TOE
Identificatio
n data: 53h
4Fh 4Dh 41h
2Dh 63h 30h
HEX
file
Secure IC
Manufactu
rer’s Web
application
Infineon
2328A2C0C731BC0D
C37A63CD7CE80530
FB582E2430684289
0919CFCC1DF8B3C8
23FA9B970250075A
F90AADD55CCF08D5
081865211E3C8C74
B39DE44ED3DCE94C
9/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
30h 37h 5Fh
34h)
Document
Initialization
Guidance for
SOMA-c007
Machine
Readable
Electronic
Document
v2.5, ref.
TCAE160012
docx
Encrypted
email
message
Initialization
Agent
A67B927BB875030ADD
05FDFDD922D52A9C01
B95A1CA74AAC281067
4EDB1F3626EC89BC3E
B9BE89035D34711EB7
EF4A42221E30E4EB02
C386F8493B7F31A012
AE
Document
Pre-
personalizati
on Guidance
for SOMA-
c007
Machine
Readable
Electronic
Document
ICAO
Application
v2.4, ref.
TCAE160016
docx
Encrypted
email
message
Pre-
personalization
Agent
1AABDEAB60484FB75E
A5D3DC35654DF1F316
22632161CDBC5CAED2
7DBCEC57B8F22A16C8
F4044617E8832F216D
9C903126EBA3EC106A
7D720A74C2EACE1B2E
CF
Document
Personalizati
on Guidance
for SOMA-
c007
Machine
Readable
docx
Encrypted
email
message
Personalization
Agent
49A55FBE96A2DCC8FD
10F1502562A9BD6CCD
FF511F56EC40160D21
4AEAF77E68F9853787
F551151076B4B9AF41
5D5DF102A5D67621D3
10/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
Electronic
Document
SSCD
application,
version 2.3,
ref.
TCAE160014
ED2C39D02116CFE33C
FE
Document
Operational
User
Guidance for
SOMA-c007
Machine
Readable
Electronic
Document
SSCD
application,
version 2.3,
ref.
TCAE160015
docx
Encrypted
email
message
User (Inspection
System)
13B258FF3F3078698D
1DCDC50A729CF15603
09B5985E707550405F
3C3EB7E671E0FBD4DA
CF46DC183F2A8A0150
7C39979FC8A9DFF577
79EF7FBEFC4EE88AA3
6E
The delivery procedure for the TOE is described in detail in Secure Delivery Procedure, ref.
TCAE110027.
DOCUMENTS
The product includes the following documents that shall be distributed and made available
together to the users of the evaluated version.
• Initialization Guidance for SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document, version 2.5,
ref. TCAE160012.
• Pre-personalization Guidance for SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document SSCD
application, version 2.3, ref. TCAE160013.
• Personalization Guidance for SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document SSCD
application, version 2.3, ref. TCAE160014.
• Operational User Guidance for SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document SSCD
application, version 2.3, ref. TCAE160015.
11/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
• Secure Delivery Procedure, version 2.5, ref. TCAE110027.
PRODUCT TESTING
The evaluation has been performed according to the Composite Evaluation Scheme as defined in
the guides [JILCOMP] and [JILADVARC] in order to assess that the combination of the TOE with the
underlying platform did not lead to any exploitable vulnerability.
This evaluation has then taken into account the evaluation results and security recommendations
for the platform which is part of the evaluated composite TOE, and was already certified with
certificate BSI-DSZ-CC-0891-V6-2021.
The developer has executed test for all the declared security functions. All the tests have been
performed by the developer in its premises, with a satisfactory result.
During the evaluation process, each test unit has been executed to check that the declared security
functionality has been identified and also to check that the kind of test is appropriate to the
function that is intended to test.
All the tests have been developed using a testing scenario appropriate to the established
architecture in the security target. It has also been checked that the obtained results during the
tests fit or correspond to the previously estimated results.
To verify the results of the developer tests, the evaluation team has applied a sampling strategy and
has concluded that the information is complete and coherent enough to reproduce tests and
identify the functionality tested. Moreover, the evaluation team has planned and executed
additional tests independently of those executed by the developer.
The obtained results have been checked to be conformant to the expected results and in cases
where a deviation relative to the expected results has been detected the evaluator has confirmed
that this variation neither represents any security problem nor a decrease in the functional capacity
of the product.
PENETRATION TESTING
Based on the list of potential vulnerabilities applicable to the TOE in its operational environment,
the evaluation team has devised attack scenarios for penetration tests according to JIL supporting
documents [JILAAPS] and [JILADVARC]. Within these activities all aspects of the security
architecture which were not covered by functional testing have been considered.
The implementations of the requirements of the provided platform’s ETR for Composition and
guidance, as well as of the security mechanisms of the TOE in general have been verified by the
evaluation team. An appropriate test set was devised to cover these potential vulnerabilities.
The overall test result is that no deviations were found between the expected and the actual test
results. No attack scenario with the High attack potential has been successful in the TOE’s
12/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
operational environment as defined in the security target when all measures required by the
developer are applied.
EVALUATED CONFIGURATION
The software and hardware requirements, as well as the referenced options are indicated below.
Therefore, for the operation of the SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document SSCD
Application version 4 it is not necessary any additional software or hardware components.
The version of the software may be retrieved by following the procedure in section 4.2 (Retrieval of
TOE, product and chip information) of the “Initialization Guidance for SOMA-c007 Machine
Readable Electronic Document, version 2.5, ref. TCAE160012”.
To identify the TOE is necessary for the initialization agent to execute the “GET DATA (Even INS)”
command with P1 = 01h and P2 = 20h. APDU shall be encoded as follows:
• CLA = E0h
• INS = CAh
• P1 = 01h
• P2 = 20h
• LE = 00h
The e-Document certified under Common Criteria v.3.1 at the EAL5+ security assurance level shall
return SOMA-c007_4 (ASCII codes 53h 4Fh 4Dh 41h 2Dh 63h 30h 30h 37h 5Fh 34h), representing
the TOE Identification Data.
EVALUATION RESULTS
The product SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document SSCD Application version 4 has
been evaluated against the Security Target TCAE180037 - SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic
Document - Security Target SSCD Application - Recertification, version 1.4, 18.10.2022.
All the assurance components required by the evaluation level EAL5 + ALC_DVS.2 + AVA_VAN.5
have been assigned a “PASS” verdict. Consequently, the laboratory Applus Laboratories assigns the
“PASS” VERDICT to the whole evaluation due all the evaluator actions are satisfied for the
evaluation level EAL5 + ALC_DVS.2 + AVA_VAN.5, as defined by the Common Criteria version 3.1 R5
and the CEM version 3.1 R5.
13/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE EVALUATION TEAM
Next, recommendations regarding the secure usage of the TOE are provided. These have been
collected along the evaluation process and are detailed to be considered when using the product.
The evaluation team makes the following security recommendations:
- To follow the security guidance’s of the TOE strictly
- To keep the TOE under personal control and set all other security measures available
from the environment.
- To periodically review the status of the certification of the underlying platform.
CERTIFIER RECOMMENDATIONS
Considering the obtained evidences during the instruction of the certification request of the
product SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document SSCD Application version 4, a positive
resolution is proposed.
The certifier strongly recommends to the TOE consumer to strictly follow the security
recommendations that can be found on guidance documents as well as to observe the operational
environment requirements and assumptions defined in the applicable security target.
Some of the key lengths for some of the cryptographic mechanisms defined in the ST are
considered as legacy mechanisms according to [ACM]. Please check [ACM] to consult
recommended dates to sunset the applicable key lengths.
GLOSSARY
CCN Centro Criptológico Nacional
CNI Centro Nacional de Inteligencia
EAL Evaluation Assurance Level
ETR Evaluation Technical Report
OC Organismo de Certificación
TOE Target Of Evaluation
14/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
BIBLIOGRAPHY
The following standards and documents have been used for the evaluation of the product:
[1999/93/EU] European Parliament: Directive 1999/93/EC on a Community framework for
electronic signatures, December 1999.
[2016/650/EU] European Parliament: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/650, 25 April
2016.
[910/2014/EU] European Parliament: Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and
of the Council, 23 July 2014.
[ACM] SOG-IS agreed cryptographic mechanisms, version 1.3. SOG-IS crypto working group.
February 2023.
[CC_P1] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 1: Introduction and
general model, Version 3.1, R5 Final, April 2017.
[CC_P2] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 2: Security functional
components, Version 3.1, R5 Final, April 2017.
[CC_P3] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 3: Security assurance
components, Version 3.1, R5 Final, April 2017.
[CEM] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation: Version 3.1, R5 Final,
April 2017.
[JILAAPS]Joint Interpretation Library. Application of Attack Potential to Smartcards, version 3.2.
Nov.2022.
[JILADVARC] Joint Interpretation Library. Security Architecture requirements (ADV_ARC) for Smart
Cards and similar devices, version 2.1, Jul, 2021.
[JILCOMP] Joint Interpretation Library. Composite Product evaluation for Smart Cards and similar
devices, version 1.5.1. May 2018.
[M7892] Infineon: Security Target Lite, Common Criteria EAL6 augmented / EAL6+, M7892 Design
Steps D11 and G12, Document version 3.6 as of 2021-10-06.
[PP-0059] CEN: Protection profiles for secure signature creation device, Part 2: Device with Key
Generation, version 2.0.1, ref. BSI-CC-PP-0059-2009-MA-01, January 2012.
[PP-0071] CEN: Protection profiles for secure signature creation device, Part 4: Extension for device
with key generation and trusted communication with certificate generation application, version
1.0.1, ref. BSI-CC-PP-0071-2012, November 2012.
[PP-0072] CEN: Protection profiles for secure signature creation device, Part 5: Extension for device
with key generation and trusted communication with signature creation application, version 1.0.1,
ref. BSI-CC-PP-0072-2012, November 2012.
15/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
[ST] TCAE180037 - SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document - Security Target SSCD
Application - Recertification, version 1.4, 18.10.2022.
SECURITY TARGET / SECURITY TARGET LITE
Along with this certification report, the complete security target of the evaluation is stored and
protected in the Certification Body premises. This document is identified as:
- TCAE180037 - SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document - Security Target SSCD
Application - Recertification, version 1.4, 18.10.2022.
The public version of this document constitutes the ST Lite. The ST Lite has also been reviewed for
the needs of publication according to [CCDB-2006-04-004], and it is published along with this
certification report in the Certification Body and CCRA websites. The ST Lite identifier is:
- TCLE180038 - SOMA-c007 Machine Readable Electronic Document - Security Target SSCD
Application - Recertification, version 1.3, 06.03.2023.
16/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
RECOGNITION AGREEMENTS
In order to avoid multiple certification of the same product in different countries a mutual
recognition of IT security certificates - as far as such certificates are based on ITSEC or CC - under
certain conditions was agreed.
European Recognition of ITSEC/CC – Certificates (SOGIS-MRA)
The SOGIS-Mutual Recognition Agreement (SOGIS-MRA) Version 3 became effective in April 2010. It
defines the recognition of certificates for IT-Products at a basic recognition level and, in addition, at
higher recognition levels for IT-Products related to certain SOGIS Technical Domains only.
The basic recognition level includes Common Criteria (CC) Evaluation Assurance Levels EAL 1 to EAL
4 and ITSEC Evaluation Assurance Levels E1 to E3 (basic). For "Smartcards and similar devices" a
SOGIS Technical Domain is in place. For "HW Devices with Security Boxes" a SOGIS Technical
Domains is in place, too. In addition, certificates issued for Protection Profiles based on Common
Criteria are part of the recognition agreement.
The new agreement has been signed by the national bodies of Austria, Finland, France, Germany,
Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The current list of
signatory nations and approved certification schemes, details on recognition, and the history of the
agreement can be seen on the website at https://www.sogis.eu.
The SOGIS-MRA logo printed on the certificate indicates that it is recognised under the terms of this
agreement by the nations listed above.
The certificate of this TOE is recognized under SOGIS-MRA for all assurance components selected.
International Recognition of CC – Certificates (CCRA)
The international arrangement on the mutual recognition of certificates based on the CC (Common
Criteria Recognition Arrangement, CCRA-2014) has been ratified on 08 September 2014. It covers
CC certificates based on collaborative Protection Profiles (cPP) (exact use), CC certificates based on
assurance components up to and including EAL 2 or the assurance family Flaw Remediation
(ALC_FLR) and CC certificates for Protection Profiles and for collaborative Protection Profiles (cPP).
The CCRA-2014 replaces the old CCRA signed in May 2000 (CCRA-2000). Certificates based on CCRA-
2000, issued before 08 September 2014 are still under recognition according to the rules of CCRA-
2000. For on 08 September 2014 ongoing certification procedures and for Assurance Continuity
(maintenance and re-certification)of old certificates a transition period on the recognition of
certificates according to the rules of CCRA-2000 (i.e. assurance components up to and including EAL
4 or the assurance family Flaw Remediation (ALC_FLR)) is defined until 08 September 2017.
17/17
https://oc.ccn.cni.es
organismo.certificacion@cni.es
As of September 2014 the signatories of the new CCRA-2014 are government representatives from
the following nations: Australia, Austria, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, The Netherlands, New Zealand,
Norway, Pakistan, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom, and the
United States.
The current list of signatory nations and approved certification schemes can be seen on the
website: http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org.
The Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement logo printed on the certificate indicates that this
certification is recognised under the terms of this agreement by the nations listed above.
The certificate of this TOE is recognized under CCRA for all assurance components up to EAL2 and
ALC_FLR.