Certification Report
Trend Micro Deep Discovery Inspector 3.2, build 1118
Issued by:
Communications Security Establishment Canada
Certification Body
Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme
© Government of Canada, Communications Security Establishment Canada, 2014
Document number: 383-4-252-CR
Version: 1.0
Date: 21 January 2014
Pagination: i to iii, 1 to 9
CCS Certification Report Trend Micro Incorporated
Trend Micro DDI v3.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 21 January 2014
- Page i of iii -
DISCLAIMER
The Information Technology (IT) product identified in this certification report, and its
associated certificate, has been evaluated at an approved evaluation facility – established
under the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) – using the
Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision
4, for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation,
Version 3.1 Revision 4. This certification report, and its associated certificate, apply only to
the identified version and release of the product in its evaluated configuration. The evaluation
has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the CCS, and the conclusions of the
evaluation facility in the evaluation report are consistent with the evidence adduced. This
report, and its associated certificate, are not an endorsement of the IT product by the
Communications Security Establishment Canada, or any other organization that recognizes
or gives effect to this report, and its associated certificate, and no warranty for the IT product
by the Communications Security Establishment Canada, or any other organization that
recognizes or gives effect to this report, and its associated certificate, is either expressed or
implied.
CCS Certification Report Trend Micro Incorporated
Trend Micro DDI v3.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 21 January 2014
- Page ii of iii -
FOREWORD
The Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) provides a
third-party evaluation service for determining the trustworthiness of Information Technology
(IT) security products. Evaluations are performed by a commercial Common Criteria
Evaluation Facility (CCEF) under the oversight of the CCS Certification Body, which is
managed by the Communications Security Establishment Canada.
The evaluation facility that carried out this evaluation is CygnaCom Solutions.
By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, the CCS Certification Body asserts that the
product complies with the security requirements specified in the associated security target. A
security target is a requirements specification document that defines the scope of the
evaluation activities. The consumer of certified IT products should review the security target,
in addition to this certification report, in order to gain an understanding of any assumptions
made during the evaluation, the IT product's intended environment, its security requirements,
and the level of confidence (i.e., the evaluation assurance level) that the product satisfies the
security requirements.
This certification report is associated with the certificate of product evaluation dated 21
January 2014, and the security target identified in Section 4 of this report.
The certification report, certificate of product evaluation and security target are posted on the
CCS Certified Products list (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the official website of the
Common Criteria Project).
Reproduction of this report is authorized provided the report is reproduced in its entirety.
CCS Certification Report Trend Micro Incorporated
Trend Micro DDI v3.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 21 January 2014
- Page iii of iii -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Disclaimer....................................................................................................................................... i
Foreword........................................................................................................................................ii
Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... 1
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation................................................................................. 2
2 TOE Description ................................................................................................................... 2
3 Evaluated Security Functionality........................................................................................ 2
4 Security Target...................................................................................................................... 2
5 Common Criteria Conformance.......................................................................................... 3
6 Security Policy....................................................................................................................... 4
7 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope............................................................................. 4
7.1 SECURE USAGE ASSUMPTIONS................................................................................... 4
7.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................... 4
8 Evaluated Configuration...................................................................................................... 5
9 Documentation ...................................................................................................................... 5
10 Evaluation Analysis Activities ............................................................................................. 5
11 ITS Product Testing.............................................................................................................. 6
11.1 ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPER TESTS .......................................................................... 6
11.2 INDEPENDENT FUNCTIONAL TESTING ........................................................................ 6
11.3 INDEPENDENT PENETRATION TESTING....................................................................... 7
11.4 CONDUCT OF TESTING ............................................................................................... 7
11.5 TESTING RESULTS...................................................................................................... 7
12 Results of the Evaluation...................................................................................................... 7
13 Evaluator Comments, Observations and Recommendations ........................................... 8
14 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations..................................................................... 8
15 References.............................................................................................................................. 9
CCS Certification Report Trend Micro Incorporated
Trend Micro DDI v3.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 21 January 2014
- Page 1 of 9 -
Executive Summary
Trend Micro Deep Discovery Inspector 3.2, build 1118 (hereafter referred to as Trend Micro
DDI v3.2), from Trend Micro Incorporated, is the Target of Evaluation for this evaluation.
Trend Micro DDI v3.2 is an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) that protects customers’ IT
networks. This solution is deployed offline in the IT network of customers to monitor
network traffic. It can identify both file-based and network-based attacks and malicious
behavior. The TOE also takes proactive or preventive measures to ensure the security of the
detection, such as:
• Storing detection logs
• Sending alarms to administrators
• Sending cleaning requests to mitigation servers of Trend Micro if they are deployed
with the TOE
The TOE is able to protect itself and associated data from unauthorized access or
modification and provides an audit trail to ensure accountability for authorized actions.
CygnaCom Solutions is the evaluation facility that conducted the evaluation. This evaluation
was completed on 31 December 2013 and was carried out in accordance with the rules of the
Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS).
The scope of the evaluation is defined by the security target, which identifies assumptions
made during the evaluation, the intended environment for Trend Micro DDI v3.2, the
security requirements, and the level of confidence (evaluation assurance level) to which it is
asserted that the product satisfies its security requirements. Consumers are advised to verify
that their operating environment is consistent with that specified in the security target, and to
give due consideration to the comments, observations and recommendations in this
certification report.
The results documented in the Evaluation Technical Report (ETR)1
for this product provide
sufficient evidence that it meets the requirements outlined in the U.S. Government Protection
Profile Intrusion Detection System for Basic Robustness Environments, Version 1.7, July 25,
2007. The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information
Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4, for conformance to the Common
Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4.
Communications Security Establishment Canada, as the CCS Certification Body, declares
that the Trend Micro DDI v3.2 evaluation meets all the conditions of the Arrangement on the
Recognition of Common Criteria Certificates and that the product will be listed on the CCS
Certified Products list (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the official website of the
Common Criteria Project).
1
The ETR is a CCS document that contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the evaluator, and
is not releasable for public review.
CCS Certification Report Trend Micro Incorporated
Trend Micro DDI v3.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 21 January 2014
- Page 2 of 9 -
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this evaluation is Trend Micro Deep Discovery Inspector
3.2, build 1118 (hereafter referred to as Trend Micro DDI v3.2), from Trend Micro
Incorporated.
2 TOE Description
Trend Micro DDI v3.2 is an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) that protects customers’ IT
networks. This solution is deployed offline in the IT network of customers to monitor
network traffic. It can identify both file-based and network-based attacks and malicious
behavior. The TOE also takes proactive or preventive measures to ensure the security of the
detection, such as:
• Storing detection logs
• Sending alarms to administrators
• Sending cleaning requests to mitigation servers of TrendMicro if they are deployed
with the TOE
The TOE is able to protect itself and associated data from unauthorized access or
modification and provides an audit trail to ensure accountability for authorized actions.
A detailed description of the Trend Micro DDI v3.2 architecture is found in 1.4 of the
Security Target (ST).
3 Evaluated Security Functionality
The complete list of evaluated security functionality for Trend Micro DDI v3.2 is identified
in Section 1.4.2 of the ST.
4 Security Target
The ST associated with this Certification Report is identified by the following nomenclature:
Title: Trend Micro Deep Discovery Inspector 3.2 Security Target (EAL2+) v2.0
Version: v2.2
Date: 20 January 2014
CCS Certification Report Trend Micro Incorporated
Trend Micro DDI v3.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 21 January 2014
- Page 3 of 9 -
5 Common Criteria Conformance
The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology
Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4, for conformance to the Common Criteria for
Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4.
Trend Micro DDI v3.2 is:
a. Common Criteria Part 2 extended; with functional requirements based upon functional
components in Part 2, except for the following explicitly stated requirements defined in
the ST:
• IDS_SDC.1 System Data Collection (EXT);
• IDS_ANL.1 Analyser Analysis (EXT);
• IDS_RCT.1 Analyser react (EXT);
• IDS_RDR.1 Restricted data review (EXT);
• IDS_STG.1 Guarantee of System Data Availability (EXT);
• IDS_STG.2 Prevention of System data loss (EXT);
• FAV_ACT_(EXT).1 Anti-Virus actions; and
• FAV_ALR_(EXT).1 Anti-Virus alerts.
b. Common Criteria Part 3 conformant, with security assurance requirements based only
upon assurance components in Part 3;
c. Common Criteria EAL 2 augmented, containing all security assurance requirements in the
EAL 2 package, as well as the following: ALC_FLR.2 – Flaw Reporting Procedures; and
d. Demonstrable conformance to the U.S. Government Protection Profile Intrusion
Detection System for Basic Robustness Environments, Version 1.7, July 25, 2007.
CCS Certification Report Trend Micro Incorporated
Trend Micro DDI v3.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 21 January 2014
- Page 4 of 9 -
6 Security Policy
Trend Micro DDI v3.2 implements a role-based access control policy to control user access
to the system, as well as an information flow control policy to control information entering
the system; details of these security policies can be found in Section 7.1 of the ST.
In addition, Trend Micro DDI v3.2 implements other policies pertaining to security audit,
IDS, identification and authentication, and anti-virus. Further details on these security
policies may be found in Section 7.1 of the ST.
7 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope
Consumers of Trend Micro DDI v3.2 should consider assumptions about usage and
environmental settings as requirements for the product’s installation and its operating
environment. This will ensure the proper and secure operation of the TOE.
7.1 Secure Usage Assumptions
The following Secure Usage Assumptions are listed in the ST:
• The authorized administrators are not careless, willfully negligent, or hostile, and will
follow and abide by the instructions provided by the TOE documentation;
• The TOE can only be accessed by authorized system administrator and
administrators;
• The TOE has access to all the IT System data it needs to perform its functions; and
• The TOE will be managed in a manner that allows it to appropriately address changes
in the IT System the TOE monitors.
7.2 Environmental Assumptions
The following Environmental Assumptions are listed in the ST:
• The processing resources of the TOE will be located within controlled access
facilities, which will prevent unauthorized physical access;
• The TOE hardware and software critical to security policy enforcement will be
protected from unauthorized physical modification; and
• The TOE is appropriately scalable to the IT System the TOE monitors.
CCS Certification Report Trend Micro Incorporated
Trend Micro DDI v3.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 21 January 2014
- Page 5 of 9 -
8 Evaluated Configuration
The evaluated configuration for Trend Micro DDI v3.2 comprises one of three
configurations:
• The TOE software pre-installed on a DD 1000 or DD 500 appliance;
• The TOE software installed on a bare metal server with the following requirements;
o CPU: Two Intel™ Core™ Quad Core processors
o RAM: 8GB
o Hard disk space: 100GB
o Network interface card (NIC): Two NICs
• A virtual appliance installed on a virtual machine with the following requirements;
o CPU: Two Intel™ Core™ Quad Core processors
o RAM: 8GB
o Hard disk space: 100GB
o Network interface card (NIC): Two NICs
9 Documentation
The Trend Micro Incorporated documents provided to the consumer are as follows:
a. Trend Micro Deep Discovery Inspector 3.2 Administrator’s Guide, 19 December 2013;
b. Common Criteria Evaluation Addendum, 19 December 2013; and
c. Common Criteria Preparative Procedures, 31 December 2013.
10 Evaluation Analysis Activities
The evaluation analysis activities involved a structured evaluation of Trend Micro DDI v3.2,
including the following areas:
Development: The evaluators analyzed the Trend Micro DDI v3.2 functional specification
and design documentation; they determined that the design completely and accurately
describes the TOE security functionality (TSF) interfaces, the TSF subsystems and how the
TSF implements the security functional requirements (SFRs). The evaluators analyzed the
Trend Micro DDI v3.2 security architectural description and determined that the initialization
process is secure, that the security functions are protected against tamper and bypass, and that
security domains are maintained. The evaluators also independently verified that the
correspondence mappings between the design documents are correct.
Guidance Documents: The evaluators examined the Trend Micro DDI v3.2 preparative user
guidance and operational user guidance and determined that it sufficiently and
unambiguously describes how to securely transform the TOE into its evaluated configuration
and how to use and administer the product. The evaluators examined and tested the
CCS Certification Report Trend Micro Incorporated
Trend Micro DDI v3.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 21 January 2014
- Page 6 of 9 -
preparative and operational guidance, and determined that they are complete and sufficiently
detailed to result in a secure configuration.
Life-cycle support: An analysis of the Trend Micro DDI v3.2 configuration management
system and associated documentation was performed. The evaluators found that the Trend
Micro DDI v3.2 configuration items were clearly marked. The developer’s configuration
management system was observed during a site visit, and it was found to be mature and well-
developed.
The evaluators examined the delivery documentation and determined that it described all of
the procedures required to maintain the integrity of Trend Micro DDI v3.2 during distribution
to the consumer.
The evaluators reviewed the flaw remediation procedures used by developer for the Trend
Micro DDI v3.2. During a site visit, the evaluators also examined the evidence generated by
adherence to the procedures. The evaluators concluded that the procedures are adequate to
track and correct security flaws, and distribute the flaw information and corrections to
consumers of the product.
All these evaluation activities resulted in PASS verdicts.
11 ITS Product Testing
Testing consists of the following three steps: assessing developer tests, performing
independent functional tests, and performing penetration tests.
11.1 Assessment of Developer Tests
The evaluators verified that the developer has met their testing responsibilities by examining
their test evidence, and reviewing their test results, as documented in the ETR2
.
The evaluators analyzed the developer’s test coverage analysis and found it to be complete
and accurate. The correspondence between the tests identified in the developer’s test
documentation and the functional specification was complete.
11.2 Independent Functional Testing
During this evaluation, the evaluator developed independent functional tests by examining
design and guidance documentation, examining the developer's test documentation,
executing a sample of the developer's test cases, and creating test cases that augmented the
developer tests.
All testing was planned and documented to a sufficient level of detail to allow repeatability
of the testing procedures and results. Resulting from this test coverage approach is the
following list of CygnaCom Solutions test goals:
a. Repeat of Developer's Tests: The objective of this test goal is to repeat a subset of the
developer's tests;
2
The ETR is a CCS document that contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the evaluator, and
is not releasable for public review.
CCS Certification Report Trend Micro Incorporated
Trend Micro DDI v3.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 21 January 2014
- Page 7 of 9 -
b. Administrator role restrictions: The objective of this test goal is to test the restrictions
placed up the administrator account such as account deletion and expired credentials;
c. Audit functionality: The objective of this test goal is to confirm that the audit
functionality works as expected and is able to recover/re-start from unplanned
shutdowns; and
d. IDS functionality: The objective of this test goal is to exercise the IDS functionality of
the TOE and confirm that it functions as expected.
11.3 Independent Penetration Testing
Subsequent to the independent review of public domain vulnerability databases and all
evaluation deliverables, limited independent evaluator penetration testing was conducted.
The penetration tests focused on:
a. Use of automated vulnerability scanning tools to discover potential network, platform and
application layer vulnerabilities;
b. Checking input validation for login fields by inputing special character strings in an
attempt to force the TOE into a vulnerable error state;
c. Inspecting the TOE web interface for undocumented web pages that might provide a
backdoor into the TOE; and
d. Attempting to use the administrator privileges to directly access the TOE database,
operating system, or Apache server settings.
The independent penetration testing did not uncover any exploitable vulnerabilities in the
intended operating environment.
11.4 Conduct of Testing
Trend Micro DDI v3.2 was subjected to a comprehensive suite of formally documented,
independent functional and penetration tests. The testing took place onsite at the vendors
development facility. The CCS Certification Body witnessed a portion of the independent
testing. The detailed testing activities, including configurations, procedures, test cases,
expected results and observed results are documented in a separate Test Results document.
11.5 Testing Results
The developer’s tests and the independent functional tests yielded the expected results,
providing assurance that Trend Micro DDI v3.2 behaves as specified in its ST and functional
specification.
12 Results of the Evaluation
This evaluation has provided the basis for an EAL 2+ level of assurance. The overall verdict
for the evaluation is PASS. These results are supported by evidence in the ETR.
CCS Certification Report Trend Micro Incorporated
Trend Micro DDI v3.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 21 January 2014
- Page 8 of 9 -
13 Evaluator Comments, Observations and Recommendations
The evaluation team’s test activities demonstrate that the claims in the ST are met. However,
it is important to note that changing the default administrative account is not enforced by the
TOE.
Additionally, during testing the evaluators found the TOE’s ability to on-demand capture and
export network traffic sent to a specific data port an especially useful troubleshooting feature.
To access this feature navigate to Appliance IP Setting and look under Network Interface
Ports section.
14 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations
Acronym/Abbreviation/
Initialization
Description
CCS Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and
Certification Scheme
CPL Certified Products list
CM Configuration Management
EAL Evaluation Assurance Level
ETR Evaluation Technical Report
IDS
IT
Intrusion Detection System
Information Technology
SFR Security Functional Requirement
ST Security Target
TOE Target of Evaluation
CCS Certification Report Trend Micro Incorporated
Trend Micro DDI v3.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 21 January 2014
- Page 9 of 9 -
15 References
This section lists all documentation used as source material for this report:
a. CCS Publication #4, Technical Oversight, Version 1.8, October 2010.
b. Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1
Revision 4, September 2012.
c. Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, CEM,
Version 3.1 Revision 4, September 2012.
d. Trend Micro Deep Discovery Inspector 3.2 Security Target (EAL2+) v2.0, v2.2, 20
January 2014.
e. Evaluation Technical Report Deep Discovery Inspector v3.2, v1.0, 31 December
2013.