Certification Report Forum Sentry v8.1.641 Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme © Government of Canada, Communications Security Establishment, 2014 Document number: 383-4-271-CR Version: 1.2 Date: 29 July 2014 Pagination: i to iii, 1 to 10 CCS Certification Report Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry 8.1.641 ___________________________________________________________________________ Version 1.2 29 July 2014 - Page i of iii - DISCLAIMER The Information Technology (IT) product identified in this certification report, and its associated certificate, has been evaluated at an approved evaluation facility – established under the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) – using the Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4, for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4. This certification report, and its associated certificate, applies only to the identified version and release of the product in its evaluated configuration. The evaluation has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the CCS, and the conclusions of the evaluation facility in the evaluation report are consistent with the evidence adduced. This report, and its associated certificate, are not an endorsement of the IT product by the Communications Security Establishment Canada, or any other organization that recognizes or gives effect to this report, and its associated certificate, and no warranty for the IT product by the Communications Security Establishment Canada, or any other organization that recognizes or gives effect to this report, and its associated certificate, is either expressed or implied. CCS Certification Report Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry 8.1.641 ___________________________________________________________________________ Version 1.2 29 July 2014 - Page ii of iii - FOREWORD The Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) provide a third- party evaluation service for determining the trustworthiness of Information Technology (IT) security products. Evaluations are performed by a commercial Common Criteria Evaluation Facility (CCEF) under the oversight of the CCS Certification Body, which is managed by the Communications Security Establishment Canada. A CCEF is a commercial facility that has been approved by the CCS Certification Body to perform Common Criteria evaluations; a significant requirement for such approval is accreditation to the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005, the General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Accreditation is performed under the Program for the Accreditation of Laboratories - Canada (PALCAN), administered by the Standards Council of Canada. The CCEF that carried out this evaluation is CGI IT Security Evaluation & Test Facility. By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, the CCS Certification Body asserts that the product complies with the security requirements specified in the associated security target. A security target is a requirements specification document that defines the scope of the evaluation activities. The consumer of certified IT products should review the security target, in addition to this certification report, in order to gain an understanding of any assumptions made during the evaluation, the IT product's intended environment, the evaluated security functionality, and the testing and analysis conducted by the CCEF. This certification report is associated with the certificate of product evaluation dated 22 May 2014, and the security target identified in Section 4 of this report. The certification report, certificate of product evaluation and security target are posted on the CCS Certified Products list (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the official website of the Common Criteria Project). Reproduction of this report is authorized provided the report is reproduced in its entirety. CCS Certification Report Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry 8.1.641 ___________________________________________________________________________ Version 1.2 29 July 2014 - Page iii of iii - TABLE OF CONTENTS Disclaimer....................................................................................................................................... i Foreword........................................................................................................................................ii Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... 1 1 Identification of Target of Evaluation................................................................................. 2 2 TOE Description ................................................................................................................... 2 3 Security Policy....................................................................................................................... 3 4 Security Target...................................................................................................................... 3 5 Common Criteria Conformance.......................................................................................... 4 6 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope............................................................................. 5 6.1 SECURE USAGE ASSUMPTIONS................................................................................... 5 6.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................... 5 6.3 CLARIFICATION OF SCOPE.......................................................................................... 5 7 Evaluated Configuration...................................................................................................... 6 8 Documentation ...................................................................................................................... 6 9 Evaluation Analysis Activities ............................................................................................. 7 10 ITS Product Testing.............................................................................................................. 8 10.1 INDEPENDENT FUNCTIONAL TESTING ........................................................................ 8 10.2 INDEPENDENT PENETRATION TESTING....................................................................... 8 10.3 CONDUCT OF TESTING ............................................................................................... 8 10.4 TESTING RESULTS...................................................................................................... 8 11 Results of the Evaluation...................................................................................................... 8 12 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations..................................................................... 9 13 References............................................................................................................................ 10 CCS Certification Report Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry 8.1.641 ___________________________________________________________________________ Version 1.2 29 July 2014 - Page 1 of 10 - Executive Summary Forum Sentry v8.1.641 (hereafter referred to as Sentry 8.1.641), from Forum Systems, Inc., is the Target of Evaluation. Sentry 8.1.641 is conformant with the Protection Profile for Network Devices Version 1.1, 08 June 2012, hereafter referred to as PP_ND_v1.1 . Sentry 8.1.641 is a hardware TOE that provides application gateway functionality for a variety of web-based (such as HTTP and XML) and non-web-based (such as SFTP and LDAP) protocols. This functionality is implemented by an engine that examines application- layer traffic elements to apply policy to traffic. Policy takes the form of application-firewall rules, an antivirus engine, and pattern recognition rules. This allows the product to protect against attacks and to enforce access control rules based on the information within XML requests. The TOE functionality included within the scope of the evaluation is limited to the secure management features described in the PP_ND_v1.1 . CGI IT Security Evaluation & Test Facility is the CCEF that conducted the evaluation. This evaluation was completed on 30 April 2014 and was carried out in accordance with the rules of the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS). The scope of the evaluation is defined by the security target, which identifies assumptions made during the evaluation, the intended environment for Sentry 8.1.641, and the security requirements to which it is asserted that the product satisfies. Consumers are advised to verify that their operating environment is consistent with that specified in the security target, and to give due consideration to the comments, observations and recommendations in this certification report. Communications Security Establishment, as the CCS Certification Body, declares that the Sentry 8.1.641 evaluation meets all the conditions of the Arrangement on the Recognition of Common Criteria Certificates and that the product will be listed on the CCS Certified Products list (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the official website of the Common Criteria Project). CCS Certification Report Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry 8.1.641 ___________________________________________________________________________ Version 1.2 29 July 2014 - Page 2 of 10 - 1 Identification of Target of Evaluation The Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this Protection Profile (PP) conformant evaluation is Forum Sentry v8.1.641 (hereafter referred to as Sentry 8.1.641), from Forum Systems, Inc. 2 TOE Description Sentry 8.1.641 is a hardware TOE that provides application gateway functionality for a variety of web-based (such as HTTP and XML) and non-web-based (such as SFTP and LDAP) protocols. This functionality is implemented by an engine that examines application- layer traffic elements to apply policy to traffic. Policy takes the form of application-firewall rules, an antivirus engine, and pattern recognition rules. This allows the product to protect against attacks and to enforce access control rules based on the information within XML requests. The TOE functionality included within the scope of the evaluation is limited to the secure management features described in the PP_ND_v1.1 . A diagram of the Sentry 8.1.641 architecture is as follows; CCS Certification Report Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry 8.1.641 ___________________________________________________________________________ Version 1.2 29 July 2014 - Page 3 of 10 - 3 Security Policy Sentry 8.1.641 implements a role-based access control policy to control administrative access to the system. In addition, Sentry 8.1.641 implements policies pertaining to the following security functional classes: • Security Audit • Cryptographic Support • User Data Protection • Identification and Authentication • Security Management • Protection of the TOE Security Functionality (TSF) • TOE Access • Trusted Path/Channels The following cryptographic module was evaluated to the FIPS 140-2 standard: Cryptographic Module Certificate # nShield F2 6000e [1], nShield F2 1500e [2], nShield F2 500e [3] and nShield F2 10e [4] 1743 4 Security Target The ST associated with this Certification Report is identified below: Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry v8.1.641 Security Target, v1.2, 2014-06-02 CCS Certification Report Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry 8.1.641 ___________________________________________________________________________ Version 1.2 29 July 2014 - Page 4 of 10 - 5 Common Criteria Conformance The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4, for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4. Sentry 8.1.641 is: a. Protection Profile for Network Devices Version 1.1, 08 June 2012 conformant.; b. Common Criteria Part 2 extended; with functional requirements based upon functional components in Part 2, except for the following explicitly stated requirements defined in the ST: • FAU_STG_EXT.1 - External audit trail storage • FCS_CKM_EXT.4 - Cryptographic key zeroization • FCS_RBG_EXT.1 - Cryptographic operation: random bit generation • FCS_HTTPS_EXT.1 - HTTPS • FCS_TLS_EXT.1 - TLS • FIA_PMG_EXT.1 - Password management • FIA_UIA_EXT.1 - User identification and authentication • FIA_UAU_EXT.2 - Password-based authentication mechanism • FPT_SKP_EXT.1 - Protection of TSF data • FPT_APW_EXT.1 - Protection of administrator passwords • FPT_TUD_EXT.1 - Trusted update • FPT_TST_EXT.1 - TSF testing • FTA_SSL_EXT.1 - TSF-initiated session locking c. Common Criteria Part 3 conformant, with security assurance requirements based only upon assurance components in Part 3. CCS Certification Report Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry 8.1.641 ___________________________________________________________________________ Version 1.2 29 July 2014 - Page 5 of 10 - 6 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope Consumers of Sentry 8.1.641 should consider assumptions about usage and environmental settings as requirements for the product’s installation and its operating environment. This will ensure the proper and secure operation of the TOE. 6.1 Secure Usage Assumptions The following Secure Usage Assumptions are listed in the ST: • There are no general-purpose computing capabilities (e.g., compilers or user applications) available on the TOE, other than those services necessary for the operation, administration and support of the TOE; and • TOE Administrators are trusted to follow and apply all administrator guidance in a trusted manner. 6.2 Environmental Assumptions The following Environmental Assumption is listed in the ST: • Physical security, commensurate with the value of the TOE and the data it contains, is provided by the environment. 6.3 Clarification of Scope Sentry 8.1.641 application gateway functionality was not included within the scope of this evaluation, only the functionality listed in the PP_ND_v1.1 is included. When accessing the TOE via SSH, users of the TOE are required to configure the SSH client to only use AES-CBC-128 and AES-CBC-256 for encryption. Use of any other encryption algorithm for SSH is prohibited when the TOE is in its evaluated configuration. This was not the intent of the SSH requirements in the NDPP, the TOE and not the client is supposed enforce the use of AES-CBC-128 or AES-CBC-256 for encryption. CCS Certification Report Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry 8.1.641 ___________________________________________________________________________ Version 1.2 29 July 2014 - Page 6 of 10 - 7 Evaluated Configuration The evaluated configuration for Sentry 8.1.641 comprises: • Sentry v8.1.641 software running on a Forum Sentry 4564 appliance with a Thales nShield 6000e F3 HSM. The publication entitled Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry v8.1.641 Guidance Documentation Supplement v0.7, April 23, 2014 describes the procedures necessary to install and operate Sentry 8.1.641 in its evaluated configuration. 8 Documentation The Forum Systems, Inc. documents provided to the consumer are as follows: a. Forum Systems Sentry v8.1 CLI Reference Guide, January 2012; b. Forum Systems Sentry 456X Rev. B Hardware Installation Guide, January 2013; c. Forum Systems Sentry Guide to Security Worlds, January 2013; d. Forum Systems Sentry Logging Guide, January 2013; e. Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry v8.1.641 Guidance Documentation Supplement v0.7, April 23, 2014; f. Forum Systems Sentry System Management Guide, January 2013; and g. Forum Systems Sentry Web-based Administration Guide, January 2013. CCS Certification Report Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry 8.1.641 ___________________________________________________________________________ Version 1.2 29 July 2014 - Page 7 of 10 - 9 Evaluation Analysis Activities The evaluation analysis activities involved a structured evaluation of Sentry 8.1.641, including the following areas: Development: The development documentation was not reviewed, as the requirements on the content of the development documentation is implicitly assessed by virtue of the other assurance activities listed in the PP being performed. Guidance Documents: The evaluators examined the Sentry 8.1.641 preparative user guidance and operational user guidance and determined that it sufficiently and unambiguously describes how to securely transform the TOE into its evaluated configuration and how to use and administer the product. The evaluators examined and tested the preparative and operational guidance, and determined that they are complete and sufficiently detailed to result in a secure configuration. Life-cycle support: An analysis of the Sentry 8.1.641 configuration management system and associated documentation was performed. The evaluators found that the Sentry 8.1.641 configuration items were clearly marked. All these evaluation activities resulted in PASS verdicts. CCS Certification Report Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry 8.1.641 ___________________________________________________________________________ Version 1.2 29 July 2014 - Page 8 of 10 - 10 ITS Product Testing Testing consists of the following three steps: assessing developer tests, performing independent functional tests, and performing penetration tests. 10.1 Independent Functional Testing During this evaluation, the evaluator developed independent functional tests by examining design and guidance documentation. All testing was planned and documented to a sufficient level of detail to allow repeatability of the testing procedures and results. Resulting from this test coverage approach is the following CGI IT Security Evaluation & Test Facility test goal: a. PP_ND_v1.1 required assurance activities: The objective of this test goal is to perform the assurance activities mandated by the PP_ND_v1.1 10.2 Independent Penetration Testing Subsequent to the independent review of public domain vulnerability databases and all evaluation deliverables, limited independent evaluator penetration testing was conducted. The penetration tests focused on: a. PP_ND_v1.1 required assurance activities: The objective of this test goal is to perform the assurance activities mandated by the PP_ND_v1.1 ; and b. Vulnerability scans: The objective of this test goal is the use of automated vulnerability scanning tools to discover potential network, platform and application layer vulnerabilities. The independent penetration testing did not uncover any exploitable vulnerabilities in the intended operating environment. 10.3 Conduct of Testing Sentry 8.1.641 was subjected to a comprehensive suite of formally documented, independent functional and penetration tests. The CCS Certification Body witnessed a portion of the independent testing. The detailed testing activities, including configurations, procedures, test cases, expected results and observed results are documented in a separate Test Results document. 10.4 Testing Results The independent functional tests yielded the expected results, providing assurance that Sentry 8.1.641 behaves as specified in its ST and functional specification. 11 Results of the Evaluation This evaluation has provided the basis for a protection profile conformance claim as stated in Section 5. The overall verdict for the evaluation is PASS. These results are supported by evidence in the ETR. CCS Certification Report Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry 8.1.641 ___________________________________________________________________________ Version 1.2 29 July 2014 - Page 9 of 10 - 12 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations Acronym/Abbreviation/ Initialization Description CCEF Common Criteria Evaluation Facility CCS Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme CPL Certified Products list CM Configuration Management ETR Evaluation Technical Report HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol IT Information Technology ITSET Information Technology Security Evaluation and Testing LDAP Lightweight Directory Access Protocol NDPP Network Device Protection Profile PALCAN Program for the Accreditation of Laboratories - Canada SFR Security Functional Requirement SFTP Secure File Transfer Protocol ST Security Target TOE Target of Evaluation TSF TOE Security Function XML Extensible Markup Language CCS Certification Report Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry 8.1.641 ___________________________________________________________________________ Version 1.2 29 July 2014 - Page 10 of 10 - 13 References This section lists all documentation used as source material for this report: a. CCS Publication #4, Technical Oversight, Version 1.8, October 2010. b. Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4, September 2012. c. Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, CEM, Version 3.1 Revision 4, September 2012. d. Protection Profile for Network Devices Version 1.1, 08 June 2012 e. Forum Systems, Inc. Sentry v8.1.641 Security Target, v1.2, 2014-06-02 f. Evaluation Technical Report NDPP v1.1 Common Criteria Evaluation of Sentry 8.1.641, v1.1, June 2, 2014.