BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 for Machine Readable e-Document with ICAO Application, Basic Access Control based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e-Passport (BAC) v.1.01-I from Universal Information Technologies LLC BSI - Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik, Postfach 20 03 63, D-53133 Bonn Phone +49 (0)228 99 9582-0, Fax +49 (0)228 9582-5477, Infoline +49 (0)228 99 9582-111 Certification Report V1.0 CC-Zert-327 V5.22 BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 (*) Security IC with MRTD BAC Application Machine Readable e-Document with ICAO Application, Basic Access Control based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e-Passport (BAC) v.1.01-I from Universal Information Technologies LLC PP Conformance: Machine Readable Travel Document with "ICAO Application" Basic Access Control, Version 1.10, 25 March 2009, BSI-CC-PP-0055-2009 Functionality: PP conformant Common Criteria Part 2 extended Assurance: Common Criteria Part 3 conformant EAL 4 augmented by ALC_DVS.2 The IT Product identified in this certificate has been evaluated at an approved evaluation facility using the Common Methodology for IT Security Evaluation (CEM), Version 3.1 extended by Scheme Interpretations and CC Supporting Documents as listed in the Certification Report for conformance to the Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation (CC), Version 3.1. CC and CEM are also published as ISO/IEC 15408 and ISO/IEC 18045. (*) This certificate applies only to the specific version and release of the product in its evaluated configuration and in conjunction with the complete Certification Report and Notification. For details on the validity see Certification Report part A chapter 4 The evaluation has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the certification scheme of the German Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) and the conclusions of the evaluation facility in the evaluation technical report are consistent with the evidence adduced. This certificate is not an endorsement of the IT Product by the Federal Office for Information Security or any other organisation that recognises or gives effect to this certificate, and no warranty of the IT Product by the Federal Office for Information Security or any other organisation that recognises or gives effect to this certificate, is either expressed or implied. Bonn, 29 March 2019 For the Federal Office for Information Security Joachim Weber L.S. Head of Branch SOGIS Recognition Agreement Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement recognition for components up to EAL 2 Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik Godesberger Allee 185-189 - D-53175 Bonn - Postfach 20 03 63 - D-53133 Bonn Phone +49 (0)228 99 9582-0 - Fax +49 (0)228 9582-5477 - Infoline +49 (0)228 99 9582-111 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 This page is intentionally left blank. 4 / 26 BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 Certification Report Contents A. Certification.......................................................................................................................6 1. Preliminary Remarks.....................................................................................................6 2. Specifications of the Certification Procedure................................................................6 3. Recognition Agreements...............................................................................................7 4. Performance of Evaluation and Certification.................................................................8 5. Validity of the Certification Result..................................................................................8 6. Publication.....................................................................................................................9 B. Certification Results........................................................................................................10 1. Executive Summary.....................................................................................................11 2. Identification of the TOE..............................................................................................12 3. Security Policy.............................................................................................................13 4. Assumptions and Clarification of Scope......................................................................14 5. Architectural Information..............................................................................................14 6. Documentation............................................................................................................15 7. IT Product Testing........................................................................................................15 8. Evaluated Configuration..............................................................................................16 9. Results of the Evaluation.............................................................................................17 10. Obligations and Notes for the Usage of the TOE......................................................19 11. Security Target...........................................................................................................19 12. Definitions..................................................................................................................19 13. Bibliography...............................................................................................................21 C. Excerpts from the Criteria...............................................................................................24 D. Annexes..........................................................................................................................25 5 / 26 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 A. Certification 1. Preliminary Remarks Under the BSIG1 Act, the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) has the task of issuing certificates for information technology products. Certification of a product is carried out on the instigation of the vendor or a distributor, hereinafter called the sponsor. A part of the procedure is the technical examination (evaluation) of the product according to the security criteria published by the BSI or generally recognised security criteria. The evaluation is normally carried out by an evaluation facility recognised by the BSI or by BSI itself. The result of the certification procedure is the present Certification Report. This report contains among others the certificate (summarised assessment) and the detailed Certification Results. The Certification Results contain the technical description of the security functionality of the certified product, the details of the evaluation (strength and weaknesses) and instructions for the user. 2. Specifications of the Certification Procedure The certification body conducts the procedure according to the criteria laid down in the following: ● Act on the Federal Office for Information Security1 ● BSI Certification and Approval Ordinance2 ● BSI Schedule of Costs3 ● Special decrees issued by the Bundesministerium des Innern (Federal Ministry of the Interior) ● DIN EN ISO/IEC 17065 standard ● BSI certification: Scheme documentation describing the certification process (CC- Produkte) [3] ● BSI certification: Scheme documentation on requirements for the Evaluation Facility, its approval and licencing process (CC-Stellen) [3] ● Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation (CC), Version 3.14 [1] also published as ISO/IEC 15408. 1 Act on the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI-Gesetz - BSIG) of 14 August 2009, Bundesgesetzblatt I p. 2821 2 Ordinance on the Procedure for Issuance of Security Certificates and approval by the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI-Zertifizierungs- und -Anerkennungsverordnung - BSIZertV) of 17 December 2014, Bundesgesetzblatt 2014, part I, no. 61, p. 2231 3 Schedule of Cost for Official Procedures of the Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI-Kostenverordnung, BSI-KostV) of 03 March 2005, Bundesgesetzblatt I p. 519 6 / 26 BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 Certification Report ● Common Methodology for IT Security Evaluation (CEM), Version 3.1 [2] also published as ISO/IEC 18045 ● BSI certification: Application Notes and Interpretation of the Scheme (AIS) [4] 3. Recognition Agreements In order to avoid multiple certification of the same product in different countries a mutual recognition of IT security certificates - as far as such certificates are based on ITSEC or CC - under certain conditions was agreed. 3.1. European Recognition of CC – Certificates (SOGIS-MRA) The SOGIS-Mutual Recognition Agreement (SOGIS-MRA) Version 3 became effective in April 2010. It defines the recognition of certificates for IT-Products at a basic recognition level and, in addition, at higher recognition levels for IT-Products related to certain SOGIS Technical Domains only. The basic recognition level includes Common Criteria (CC) Evaluation Assurance Levels EAL 1 to EAL 4. For "Smartcards and similar devices" a SOGIS Technical Domain is in place. For "HW Devices with Security Boxes" a SOGIS Technical Domains is in place, too. In addition, certificates issued for Protection Profiles based on Common Criteria are part of the recognition agreement. The current list of signatory nations and approved certification schemes, details on recognition, and the history of the agreement can be seen on the website at https://www.sogisportal.eu. The SOGIS-MRA logo printed on the certificate indicates that it is recognised under the terms of this agreement by the related bodies of the signatory nations. A disclaimer beneath the logo indicates the specific scope of recognition. This certificate is recognized under SOGIS-MRA for all assurance components selected. 3.2. International Recognition of CC – Certificates (CCRA) The international arrangement on the mutual recognition of certificates based on the CC (Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement, CCRA-2014) has been ratified on 08 September 2014. It covers CC certificates based on collaborative Protection Profiles (cPP) (exact use), CC certificates based on assurance components up to and including EAL 2 or the assurance family Flaw Remediation (ALC_FLR) and CC certificates for Protection Profiles and for collaborative Protection Profiles (cPP). The current list of signatory nations and approved certification schemes can be seen on the website: https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org. The Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement logo printed on the certificate indicates that this certification is recognised under the terms of this agreement by the related bodies of the signatory nations. A disclaimer beneath the logo indicates the specific scope of recognition. This certificate is recognized according to the rules of CCRA-2014, i. e. up to and including CC part 3 EAL 2+ ALC_FLR components. 4 Proclamation of the Bundesministerium des Innern of 12 February 2007 in the Bundesanzeiger dated 23 February 2007, p. 3730 7 / 26 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 4. Performance of Evaluation and Certification The certification body monitors each individual evaluation to ensure a uniform procedure, a uniform interpretation of the criteria and uniform ratings. The product Machine Readable e-Document with ICAO Application, Basic Access Control based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e-Passport (BAC) v.1.01-I has undergone the certification procedure at BSI. This is a re-certification based on BSI-DSZ- CC-0985-2018. Specific results from the evaluation process BSI-DSZ-CC-0985-2018 were re-used. The evaluation of the product Machine Readable e-Document with ICAO Application, Basic Access Control based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e-Passport (BAC) v.1.01-I was conducted by T-Systems International GmbH. The evaluation was completed on 26 February 2019. T-Systems International GmbH is an evaluation facility (ITSEF)5 recognised by the certification body of BSI. For this certification procedure the sponsor and applicant is: Universal Information Technologies LLC. The product was developed by: Universal Information Technologies LLC. The certification is concluded with the comparability check and the production of this Certification Report. This work was completed by the BSI. 5. Validity of the Certification Result This Certification Report applies only to the version of the product as indicated. The confirmed assurance package is valid on the condition that ● all stipulations regarding generation, configuration and operation, as given in the following report, are observed, ● the product is operated in the environment described, as specified in the following report and in the Security Target. For the meaning of the assurance components and assurance levels please refer to CC itself. Detailed references are listed in part C of this report. The Certificate issued confirms the assurance of the product claimed in the Security Target at the date of certification. As attack methods evolve over time, the resistance of the certified version of the product against new attack methods needs to be re-assessed. Therefore, the sponsor should apply for the certified product being monitored within the assurance continuity program of the BSI Certification Scheme (e.g. by a re-assessment or re-certification). Specifically, if results of the certification are used in subsequent evaluation and certification procedures, in a system integration process or if a user's risk management needs regularly updated results, it is recommended to perform a re- assessment on a regular e.g. annual basis. In order to avoid an indefinite usage of the certificate when evolved attack methods would require a re-assessment of the products resistance to state of the art attack methods, the maximum validity of the certificate has been limited. The certificate issued on 29 March 2019 is valid until 28 March 2014. Validity can be re-newed by re-certification. The owner of the certificate is obliged: 5 Information Technology Security Evaluation Facility 8 / 26 BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 Certification Report 1. when advertising the certificate or the fact of the product's certification, to refer to the Certification Report as well as to provide the Certification Report, the Security Target and user guidance documentation mentioned herein to any customer of the product for the application and usage of the certified product, 2. to inform the Certification Body at BSI immediately about vulnerabilities of the product that have been identified by the developer or any third party after issuance of the certificate, 3. to inform the Certification Body at BSI immediately in the case that security relevant changes in the evaluated life cycle, e.g. related to development and production sites or processes, occur, or the confidentiality of documentation and information related to the Target of Evaluation (TOE) or resulting from the evaluation and certification procedure where the certification of the product has assumed this confidentiality being maintained, is not given any longer. In particular, prior to the dissemination of confidential documentation and information related to the TOE or resulting from the evaluation and certification procedure that do not belong to the deliverables according to the Certification Report part B, or for those where no dissemination rules have been agreed on, to third parties, the Certification Body at BSI has to be informed. In case of changes to the certified version of the product, the validity can be extended to the new versions and releases, provided the sponsor applies for assurance continuity (i.e. re-certification or maintenance) of the modified product, in accordance with the procedural requirements, and the evaluation does not reveal any security deficiencies. 6. Publication The product Machine Readable e-Document with ICAO Application, Basic Access Control based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e-Passport (BAC) v.1.01-I has been included in the BSI list of certified products, which is published regularly (see also Internet: https://www.bsi.bund.de and [5]). Further information can be obtained from BSI-Infoline +49 228 9582-111. Further copies of this Certification Report can be requested from the developer6 of the product. The Certification Report may also be obtained in electronic form at the internet address stated above. 6 Universal Information Technologies LLC Chervonoarmiyska Street, 55 03150 Kyiv Ukraine 9 / 26 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 B. Certification Results The following results represent a summary of ● the Security Target of the sponsor for the Target of Evaluation, ● the relevant evaluation results from the evaluation facility, and ● complementary notes and stipulations of the certification body. 10 / 26 BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 Certification Report 1. Executive Summary The Target of Evaluation (TOE) is The Target of Evaluation (TOE) is the contactless integrated circuit chip of machine readable electronic documents (e-Document’s chip) programmed according to the Logical Data Structure (LDS) and providing the Basic Access Control according to ‘ICAO Doc 9303’ [10] and according to the Technical Guideline TR-03110 [13]. The TOE referenced to is based on the products National Operating System (NOS) and the smart card hardware platform Infineon Security Controller M7892 B11 (BSI-DSZ-CC- 0782-V3-2017) and is extended by functionality regarding machine readable electronic documents basic access control as specified in [8] that is implemented as Machine Readable Travel Document (MRTD, or e-Document) application executed by the National Operating System (NOS). From the logical point of view the TOE comprises the complete product consisting of the parts as stated above and is not confined to any subset of them. The TOE is an electronic travel document implemented as a contactless smart card programmed according to ICAO Technical Report “Supplemental Access Control” [11] (i.e. according to the Logical Data Structure (LDS) defined in [12]). The Security Target [6] is the basis for this certification. It is based on the certified Protection Profile Machine Readable Travel Document with "ICAO Application" Basic Access Control, Version 1.10, 25 March 2009, BSI-CC-PP-0055-2009 [8]. The TOE Security Assurance Requirements (SAR) are based entirely on the assurance components defined in Part 3 of the Common Criteria (see part C or [1], Part 3 for details). The TOE meets the assurance requirements of the Evaluation Assurance Level EAL 4 augmented by ALC_DVS.2. The TOE Security Functional Requirements (SFR) relevant for the TOE are outlined in the Security Target [6], chapter 6. They are selected from Common Criteria Part 2 and some of them are newly defined. Thus the TOE is CC Part 2 extended. The TOE Security Functional Requirements are implemented by the following TOE Security Functionality: TOE Security Functionality Addressed issue TSS_Access_Control The TOE provides access control mechanisms for restricting access to a set of objects stored in the TOE. TSS_Trusted_Channel This TOE security service enforces establishment and operation of secure channels. TSS_Authentication This TOE security service enforces authentication procedures. TSS_Self-Protection The TOE enforces this TOE security service in order to protect its own genuineness (TSF and TSFdata) and to support the protection of user data stored in the TOE. Table 1: TOE Security Functionalities For more details please refer to the Security Target [6], chapter 7. The assets to be protected by the TOE are defined in the Security Target [6] , chapter 3.1 . Based on these assets the TOE Security Problem is defined in terms of Assumptions, 11 / 26 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 Threats and Organisational Security Policies. This is outlined in the Security Target [6], chapter 3. This certification covers the configurations of the TOE as outlined in chapter 8. The vulnerability assessment results as stated within this certificate do not include a rating for those cryptographic algorithms and their implementation suitable for encryption and decryption (see BSIG Section 9, Para. 4, Clause 2). The certification results only apply to the version of the product indicated in the certificate and on the condition that all the stipulations are kept as detailed in this Certification Report. This certificate is not an endorsement of the IT product by the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) or any other organisation that recognises or gives effect to this certificate, and no warranty of the IT product by BSI or any other organisation that recognises or gives effect to this certificate, is either expressed or implied. 2. Identification of the TOE The Target of Evaluation (TOE) is called: Machine Readable e-Document with ICAO Application, Basic Access Control based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e-Passport (BAC) v.1.01-I The following table outlines the TOE deliverables: No Type Identifier Release Form of Delivery 1 HW/S W Infineon Security Controller M7892 B11 including the corresponding Infineon cryptographic libraries (BSI- DSZ-CC-0782-V3-2017) - Secure Delivery 2 IC Embedded Software (National Operating System) and e-Passport application as binary file - hash value: b3 3a a3 cd 85 fa 01 83 07 97 8b d1 55 a5 55 02 de d6 25 21 b5 76 18 5b 93 7d a5 20 8c 2b f8 47 Date: 17.02.2017 Version: 1.01-I Build number: 0.33 Secure Delivery 3 DOC Operational User Guidance (AGD_OPE), Machine Readable e-Document with „ICAO Application”, based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e- Document (BAC) v.1.01-I, Universal Information Technologies LLC version 1.1, 06.07.2018 [16] Delivered in electronic form. 12 / 26 BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 Certification Report No Type Identifier Release Form of Delivery 4 DOC Preparative Procedures (AGD_PRE), Machine Readable e-Document with „ICAO Application”, based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e- Document (EAC with PACE) v.1.01-I, NOS e-Document (BAC) v.1.01-I, Universal Information Technologies LLC version 0.30, 05.12.2018 [17] Delivered in electronic form. Table 2: Deliverables of the TOE The TOE includes the certified hardware platform and Embedded Software. The delivery procedure starts after the integration and personalisation. The party responsible for the composite product integration is called “product integrator” and is played by the State Enterprise “Polygraph Combine Ukraina”. This organisation also performs the personalisation step in the role of “personalisation agent”. The delivery destination (the “user”) is the Ukrainian passport issuing authority. The TOE as the final composite product is uniquely identified by the TOE’s answer to command GET INFO (CLA = '80', INS = 'B0', P1 = '00', P2 = '00', Lc Field = '00' Data Field = 'absent', L2 Field = 'absent') as follows: Data Field = '4e 4f 53 76 31 2e 30 31 2d 49 62 30 2e 33 33 64 31 37 30 32 32 30 31 37 68 b3 3a a3 cd 85 fa 01 83 07 97 8b d1 55 a5 55 02 de d6 25 21 b5 76 18 5b 93 7d a5 20 8c 2b f8 47' In this context the TOE is identified by GET_INFO APDU command as follows: ● Embedded software version number: “1.01-I”, ● Embedded software build number “0.33”, ● Date of Embedded software building: “17.02.2017”, ● Hash value: “b3 3a a3 cd 85 fa 01 83 07 97 8b d1 55 a5 55 02 de d6 25 21 b5 76 18 5b 93 7d a5 20 8c 2b f8 47”. The Embedded Software for the TOE is delivered from the Embedded Software Manufacturer to the Composite Product Integrator in a secure way. The Embedded Software supporting documents [16 and 17] are delivered from the Embedded Software Manufacturer to the Composite Product Integrator in a secure way. Embedded Software supporting documents are marked as “National Operating System (BAC) v.1.01-I”. The IC (M7892 B11) as the Hardware Platform for the TOE is identified by its Chip Identification Data (see [14] and [15]). The Inlays are delivered from the IC Manufacturer to the Composite Product Integrator in the secure way only. For any data writing to IC M7892 B11 unique transport keys are used. The transport keys will be wrong for other types of IC. 3. Security Policy The Security Policy of the TOE is defined according to the MRTD BAC PP [8] by the Security Objectives and Requirements for the contact-less chip of machine readable travel 13 / 26 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 documents (MRTD) based on the requirements and recommendations of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO). The Security Policy addresses the advanced security methods for authentication and secure communication, which are described in detail in the Security Target [6]. 4. Assumptions and Clarification of Scope The Assumptions defined in the Security Target and some aspects of Threats and Organisational Security Policies are not covered by the TOE itself. These aspects lead to specific security objectives to be fulfilled by the TOE-Environment. The list of objectives which have to be met by the the environment can be found in the Security Target [6], chapter 4.2. 5. Architectural Information The TOE referenced to is a contactless smartcard based on the products National Operating System (NOS) and the Hardware platform Infineon Security Controller M7892 B11 (BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V3-2017) and is extended by functionality regarding machine readable electronic documents with basic access control executed by the NOS. The security functions of the TOE are: ●TSS_Access_Control ●TSS_Trusted_Channel ●TSS_Authentication ●TSS_Self-Protection The TOE platform is given by the certified hardware platform Infineon Security Controller M7892 B11. This platform contains certified cryptographic libraries that provide corresponding interfaces to the platform user. On top of this platform the TOE architecture defines dedicated subsystems that provide the TOE functionality: A protocol manager handles the communication between the TOE and the card terminal using contactless communication. A command dispatcher interacts with the protocol manager and is responsible for the identification of received commands and to build the corresponding response frames. A persistency subsystem is responsible for data writing, reading and storage using the underlying platform. This subsystem also provides the integrity of the stored data. The cryptographic subsystem provides an interface to the cryptographic features of the TOE. The requests are partly forwarded to the underlying platform and partly implemented in this subsystem. It provides access to random numbers, to hash values, digital signatures and performs cryptographic operations on the data. The generation and destruction of cryptographic keys is also provided by the subsystem. A subsystem for identification and authentication is responsible for identification and authentication of external card terminals. Also, the card terminal can identify and authenticate the TOE using this subsystem. Another subsystem provides the trusted channel between the TOE and the card terminal and ensures the integrity, authenticity and confidentiality of the exchanged data. 14 / 26 BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 Certification Report 6. Documentation The evaluated documentation as outlined in table 2 is being provided with the product to the customer. This documentation contains the required information for secure usage of the TOE in accordance with the Security Target. Additional obligations and notes for secure usage of the TOE as outlined in chapter 10 of this report have to be followed. 7. IT Product Testing Note: Due the fact that the TOE is a sub-functionality of the certified product “Machine Readable Electronic Document with ICAO Application, Extended Access Control with PACE based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e-Passport (EAC with PACE) v.1.01-I” (refer to the certification ID BSI-DSZ-CC-0985), which was also evaluated by T- Systems, the test results and penetration tests carried out for the certified product were re- used for this TOE, because the current TOE is contained fully in BSI-DSZ-CC-0985. Developer Tests The tests performed by the developer can be divided into the following categories: ● tests which are performed in a simulation environment with different tools for the analogue circuitries and for the digital parts of the TOE; ● functional tests which are performed with special software; ● characterisation and verification tests to release the hardware platform for production including tests with different operating conditions as well as special verification tests for security services and security features of the hardware; ● functional tests at the end of the production process using IC Dedicated Test Software. These tests are executed for every chip to check its correct functionality as last step of phase 3. The developer tests cover all TSFIs as identified in the functional specification as well as in the test documentation. Evaluator Tests The evaluators were able to repeat the tests of the developer. A test protocol of the tests provided by the developer was verified. The tests of the developer are repeated by sampling. In addition the evaluators performed independent tests to supplement, augment and to verify the tests performed by the developer. The evaluation provides evidence that the current version of the TOE provides the TOE Security Functionality as specified by the developer. The test results confirm the correct implementation of the TOE Security Functionality. For penetration testing the evaluators took all TOE Security Functionality into consideration. Extensive penetration testing was performed to test the security mechanisms used to provide the Security Services and Security Features. The evaluators performed the tests using smart cards with the software or using the emulator. For both cases, the correct software image was used. The SHA1 function cannot be called by the final product. Therefore the developer implemented additional command interface to call the function for SCA tests. 15 / 26 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 All tests were carried out in developer’s environment with the test samples configured as the TOE, except for the SHA1-SCA tests. By the tests carried out using the emulators, the same device image was loaded as the TOE. For the side channel analysis of the SHA1 function the evaluators used the test samples provided for the SHA1 side channel analysis. For this purpose the developer provided two kind of test samples: ● Test samples configured as intended TOE ● Test samples with additional command interface for SHA1 function Reading the value provided by the TOE, the evaluators verified the test samples provided by the developer using GET_INFO command. Having read the information the evaluators verified that the information read from the tests samples were same as depicted in section 1.2 of the Security Target [6], except for the “checksum”, that is hash value for embedded software based on SHA-256 provided by the test samples with additional command interface for SHA1 function. Considering the embedded software of those test samples included additional command interfaces, this was according to the expectation of the evaluators. The evaluators documented the tested configurations and the validity of test results for the TOE. Considering the potential vulnerability of the SHA1 function, the evaluator received test samples that were configured exactly as the TOE. The evaluators verified the configuration by reading the SHA256-HASH value, that was identical to the hash value shown in section 1.2 of the Security Target [6], with the GET_INFO command. However the TOE does not allow to call the SHA1 function directly. Therefore the effort for a side channel analysis would be increased significantly by collecting the signal tracks and by the analysis. Accordingly the evaluators used additional test samples with direct interface to the SHA1 function. The tests showed that the TOE works as expected and no vulnerabilities were identified. 8. Evaluated Configuration This certification covers the following configurations of the TOE: The TOE (BSI-DSZ-CC-0985) is identified by GET_INFO APDU command as follows: ● Embedded software version number: “1.01-I”, ● Embedded software build number “0.33”, ● Date of Embedded software building: “17.02.2017”, ● Hash value: “b3 3a a3 cd 85 fa 01 83 07 97 8b d1 55 a5 55 02 de d6 25 21 b5 76 18 5b 93 7d a5 20 8c 2b f8 47”. (For details please see the Security Target [6], chapter 1.2.) The TOE is a composite product. The TOE includes the certified hardware platform and Embedded Software. The IC (M7892 B11) as the Hardware Platform for the TOE is identified by its Chip Identification Data (see [14] and [15]). The Inlays are delivered from the IC Manufacturer to 16 / 26 BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 Certification Report the Composite Product Integrator in the secure way only. For any data writing to IC M7892 B11 unique transport keys are used. The transport keys will be wrong for other types of IC. The TOE as the final composite product is uniquely identified by the TOE’s answer to command GET INFO (CLA = '80', INS = 'B0', P1 = '00', P2 = '00', Lc Field = '00' Data Field = 'absent', L2 Field = 'absent') as follows: Data Field = '4e 4f 53 76 31 2e 30 31 2d 49 62 30 2e 33 33 64 31 37 30 32 32 30 31 37 68 b3 3a a3 cd 85 fa 01 83 07 97 8b d1 55 a5 55 02 de d6 25 21 b5 76 18 5b 93 7d a5 20 8c 2b f8 47' 9. Results of the Evaluation 9.1. CC specific results The Evaluation Technical Report (ETR) [7] was provided by the ITSEF according to the Common Criteria [1], the Methodology [2], the requirements of the Scheme [3] and all interpretations and guidelines of the Scheme (AIS) [4] as relevant for the TOE. The Evaluation Methodology CEM [2] was used and guidance specific for the technology of the product [4] (AIS 34). The following guidance specific for the technology was used: Application of CC to Integrated Circuits, ● Application of Attack Potential to Smartcards, ● Composite product evaluation for Smart Cards and similar devices (see AIS 36). According to this concept the relevant guidance documents of the underlying platform and the documents ETR for Composition from the platform evaluations (i.e. on hardware) have been applied in the TOE evaluation. (see [4], AIS 25, 26, 36). For RNG assessment of the platform chip the scheme interpretations AIS 31 was used (see [4]). As a result of the evaluation the verdict PASS is confirmed for the following assurance components: ● All components of the EAL 4 package including the class ASE as defined in the CC (see also part C of this report) ● The components ALC_DVS.2 augmented for this TOE evaluation. As the evaluation work performed for this certification procedure was carried out as a re- evaluation based on the certificate BSI-DSZ-CC-0985-2018, re-use of specific evaluation tasks was possible. The focus of this re-evaluation was on the change of the PP conformance claim from BSI-CC-PP-0056-V2-2012-MA-02 [9] to BSI-CC-PP-0055-2009 [8]. The TOE itself did not change. The evaluation has confirmed: ● PP Conformance: Machine Readable Travel Document with "ICAO Application" Basic Access Control, Version 1.10, 25 March 2009, BSI-CC-PP-0055-2009 [8] ● for the Functionality: PP conformant Common Criteria Part 2 extended 17 / 26 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 ● for the Assurance: Common Criteria Part 3 conformant EAL 4 augmented by ALC_DVS.2 For specific evaluation results regarding the development and production environment see annex B in part D of this report. The results of the evaluation are only applicable to the TOE as defined in chapter 2 and the configuration as outlined in chapter 8 above. 9.2. Results of cryptographic assessment The following table gives an overview of the cryptographic functionalities inside the TOE to enforce the security policy and outlines the standard of application where its specific appropriateness is stated. Purpose Cryptographic Mechanism Standard of Implementation Key Size in Bits Standard of Application Comment Key derivation of Basic Access Keys (KENC, KMAC) from Kseed. 3DES in CBC mode using SHA-1 (for KENC) 3DES in Retail- MAC using SHA-1 (for KMAC) FIPS PUB 46-3 (3DES) SP 800-38A (CBC) ISO/IEC 9797-1:2011 (Retail MAC) FIPS PUB 180-4 (SHA) ICAO 9303, Part 11 |k|=112 ICAO 9303, Part 11 FCS_CKM.1 FCS_COP.1/SHA Key derivation of the Retail-MAC message authentication keys for secure messaging integrity (KMAC) DES MAC algorithm 3, block cipher DES, Sequence Message Counter, padding method 2 ISO/IEC 9797-1:2011 (Retail MAC) FIPS PUB 46-3 (DES) ICAO 9303, Part 11 |k|=112 ICAO 9303, Part 11 FCS_COP.1/MAC, FCS_CKM.1 Key derivation of session keys (KSENC, KSMAC) Document Basic Access Key Derivation Algorithm with (K.IC xor K.IFD) as key seed FIPS PUB 46-3 (3DES) ISO/IEC 9797-1:2011 (Retail MAC) ICAO 9303, Part 11 |k|=112 ICAO 9303, Part 11 FCS_CKM.1 FCS_COP.1/SHA Symmetric Encryption / Decryption for secure messaging 3DES in CBC mode FIPS PUB 46-3 (3DES) SP 800-38A (CBC) |k|=112 ICAO 9303, Part 11 FCS_COP.1/ENC FDP_UCT.1 Integrity for secure messaging DES in Retail MAC mode FIPS PUB 46-3 (DES) ISO 9797 (Retail MAC) |k|=112 ICAO 9303, Part 11 FDP_UIT.1 Trusted Channel Secure messaging in ENC_MAC ICAO 9303, Part 11, additionally cf. entries 1-5 - ICAO 9303, Part 11 FDP_ITC.1 18 / 26 BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 Certification Report Purpose Cryptographic Mechanism Standard of Implementation Key Size in Bits Standard of Application Comment mode Authentication of a terminal as Personalization Agent Authentication based on AES in CBC mode (according to the challenge- response protocol) FIPS PUB 197 (AES) SP 800-38A (CBC) [19] |k|=128 |chal- lenge| = 64 Not applicable / Security Level lower than 100 bit FCS_COP.1/AUT H Table 3: TOE cryptographic functionality Note: The Standards of Implementation and Application are referenced in [18]. The strength of the these cryptographic algorithms was not rated in the course of this certification procedure (see BSIG Section 9, Para. 4, Clause 2). All cryptographic algorithms listed here are implemented by the TOE because of the standards building the TOE application. For that reason, an explicit validity period is not given for this crypto functionality. 10. Obligations and Notes for the Usage of the TOE ● The documents as outlined in table 2 contain necessary information about the usage of the TOE and all security hints therein have to be considered. In addition all aspects of Assumptions, Threats and OSPs as outlined in the Security Target not covered by the TOE itself need to be fulfilled by the operational environment of the TOE. The Integration/Production/Personalisation site as mentioned in chapter 2 of this report is: Polygraph Combine “Ukraina”, 38-44 Dehtiarivska Str., Kyiv, 04119, Ukraine and has been audited in the scope of this evaluation / certification. This certificate is only valid for TOEs personalised in this site and according to [19] which is confidential and only available at this site. The customer or user of the product shall consider the results of the certification within his system risk management process. In order for the evolution of attack methods and techniques to be covered, he should define the period of time until a re-assessment of the TOE is required and thus requested from the sponsor of the certificate. 11. Security Target For the purpose of publishing, the Security Target [6] of the Target of Evaluation (TOE) is provided within a separate document as Annex A of this report. 12. Definitions 12.1. Acronyms AA Active Authentication AES Advanced Encryption Standard AIS Application Notes and Interpretations of the Scheme 19 / 26 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 APDU Application Protocol Data Unit BAC Basic Access Control BSI Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik / Federal Office for Information Security, Bonn, Germany BSIG BSI-Gesetz / Act on the Federal Office for Information Security CA Chip Authentication CCRA Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement CC Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation CEM Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation cPP Collaborative Protection Profile DES Data Encryption Standard; symmetric block cipher algorithm EAC Extended Access Control EAL Evaluation Assurance Level ECC Elliptic Curve Cryptography ETR Evaluation Technical Report ICAO International Civil Aviation Organisation IT Information Technology ITSEF Information Technology Security Evaluation Facility LDS Logical Data Structure MAC Message Authentication Code MRTD Machine Readable Travel Document NOS National Operating System PACE Password Authenticated Connection Establishment PP Protection Profile RNG Random Number Generator SAR Security Assurance Requirement SCA Side Channel Analysis SFP Security Function Policy SFR Security Functional Requirement SHA Secure Hash Algorithm SM Secure Messaging ST Security Target TA Terminal Authentication TOE Target of Evaluation TSF TOE Security Functionality 20 / 26 BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 Certification Report 12.2. Glossary Augmentation - The addition of one or more requirement(s) to a package. Collaborative Protection Profile - A Protection Profile collaboratively developed by an International Technical Community endorsed by the Management Committee. Extension - The addition to an ST or PP of functional requirements not contained in CC part 2 and/or assurance requirements not contained in CC part 3. Formal - Expressed in a restricted syntax language with defined semantics based on well- established mathematical concepts. Informal - Expressed in natural language. Object - A passive entity in the TOE, that contains or receives information, and upon which subjects perform operations. Package - named set of either security functional or security assurance requirements Protection Profile - A formal document defined in CC, expressing an implementation independent set of security requirements for a category of IT Products that meet specific consumer needs. Security Target - An implementation-dependent statement of security needs for a specific identified TOE. Semiformal - Expressed in a restricted syntax language with defined semantics. Subject - An active entity in the TOE that performs operations on objects. Target of Evaluation - An IT Product and its associated administrator and user guidance documentation that is the subject of an Evaluation. TOE Security Functionality - Combined functionality of all hardware, software, and firmware of a TOE that must be relied upon for the correct enforcement of the SFRs. 13. Bibliography [1] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1, Part 1: Introduction and general model, Revision 4, April 2012 Part 2: Security functional components, Revision 4, April 2012 Part 3: Security assurance components, Revision 4, April 2012 https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org [2] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation (CEM), Evaluation Methodology, Version 3.1, Rev. 4, April 2012, https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org [3] BSI certification: Scheme documentation describing the certification process (CC- Produkte) and Scheme documentation on requirements for the Evaluation Facility, approval and licencing (CC-Stellen), https://www.bsi.bund.de/zertifizierung [4] Application Notes and Interpretations of the Scheme (AIS) as relevant for the TOE7 https://www.bsi.bund.de/AIS 7 specifically • AIS 25, Version 9, Anwendung der CC auf Integrierte Schaltungen including JIL Document and CC Supporting Document 21 / 26 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 [5] German IT Security Certificates (BSI 7148), periodically updated list published also on the BSI Website, https://www.bsi.bund.de/zertifizierungsreporte [6] Security Target BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019, ‘Machine Readable e-Document with „ICAO Application”, Basic Access Control based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e-Passport (BAC) v.1.01-I’, Version 1.0 Date 11.12.2018, Universal Information Technologies LLC [7] Evaluation Technical Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019, Machine Readable e- Document with ICAO Application, Basic Access Control based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e-Passport (BAC) v.1.01-I, Version 1.11, Date 28.03.2019, T-Systems International GmbH, (confidential document) [8] Protection Profile Machine Readable Travel Document with "ICAO Application" Basic Access Control, Version 1.10, 25 March 2009, BSI-CC-PP-0055-2009 [9] Protection Profile Machine Readable Travel Document with "ICAO Application", Extended Access Control with PACE (EAC PP), Version 1.3.2, 5 December 2012, BSI-CC-PP-0056-V2-2012-MA-02 [10] ICAO Doc 9303-1, Specifications for electronically enabled passports with biometric identification capabilities. In Machine Readable Travel Documents – Part 1: Machine Readable Passport, volume 2, ICAO, 6th edition, 2006 [11] ICAO TR-SAC, MACHINE READABLE TRAVEL DOCUMENTS, TECHNICAL REPORT: Supplemental Access Control for Machine Readable Travel Documents, Version 1.00, November 2010 [12] ICAO TR-LDS, MACHINE READABLE TRAVEL DOCUMENTS, Technical Report: Development of a Logical Data Structure - LDS - for optional Capacity Expansion Technologies, May 2004 [13] TR-03110-1, Technical Guideline: Advanced Security Mechanisms for Machine Readable Travel Documents and eIDAS Token – Part 1 – eMRTDs with BAC/PACEv2 and EACv1, Version 2.20, 26.02.2015, Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI) [14] Security Target BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V3-2017, Version 2.6, 2017-08-02, Security Target Lite M7892 B11 [15] Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V3-2017 for Infineon Security Controller M7892 B11 from Infineon Technologies AG, Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik, 05.09.2017 • AIS 26, Version 10, Evaluationsmethodologie für in Hardware integrierte Schaltungen including JIL Document and CC Supporting Document • AIS 31, Version 3, Funktionalitätsklassen und Evaluationsmethodologie für physikalische Zufallszahlengeneratoren • AIS 32, Version 7, CC-Interpretationen im deutschen Zertifizierungsschema • AIS 34, Version 3, Evaluation Methodology for CC Assurance Classes for EAL 5+ (CCv2.3 & CCv3.1) and EAL 6 (CCv3.1) • AIS 36, Version 5, Kompositionsevaluierung including JIL Document and CC Supporting Document • AIS 38, Version 2.9, Reuse of evaluation results 22 / 26 BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 Certification Report [16] Operational User Guidance (AGD_OPE), Machine Readable e-Document with „ICAO Application”, based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e-Document (BAC) v.1.01-I, Universal Information Technologies LLC, version 1.1, 06.07.2018 [17] Preparative Procedures (AGD_PRE), Machine Readable e-Document with „ICAO Application”, based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e-Document (EAC with PACE) v.1.01-I, NOS e-Document (BAC) v.1.01-I, Universal Information Technologies LLC (BSI_DCZ_CC-0985, BSI_DCZ_CC-0987), version 0.30, 05.12.2018 [18] - FIPS PUB 180-4: Secure Hash Signature Standard (SHS). NIST, March 2012 - FIPS PUB 197: Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), November 2001 - FIPS PUB 46-3: DATA ENCRYPTION STANDARD (DES). NIST. 25.10.1999 - ICAO 9303: Machine Readable Travel Documents. Part 2 - Specifications for the Security of the Design, Manufacture and Issuance of MRTDs. Edition 7, 2015. - ISO/IEC 9797-1: Information technology - Security techniques - Message Authentication Codes (MACs) - Part 1: Mechanisms using a block cipher. Edition 2, March 2011 - SP 800-38A: NIST Special Publication 800-38A: Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation: Methods and Techniques: December 2001 [19] Authentication of a Terminal as Personalization Agent Algorithm Description, Machine Readable e-Document with “ICAO Application” based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e-Document (BAC) v.1.01-I, Version 1.0, Universal Information Technologies LLC, 13.02.2019 (Confidential Document) 23 / 26 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 C. Excerpts from the Criteria For the meaning of the assurance components and levels the following references to the Common Criteria can be followed: • On conformance claim definitions and descriptions refer to CC part 1 chapter 10.4 • On the concept of assurance classes, families and components refer to CC Part 3 chapter 7.1 • On the concept and definition of pre-defined assurance packages (EAL) refer to CC Part 3 chapters 7.2 and 8 • On the assurance class ASE for Security Target evaluation refer to CC Part 3 chapter 11 • On the detailled definitions of the assurance components for the TOE evaluation refer to CC Part 3 chapters 12 to 16 • The table in CC part 3 , Annex E summarizes the relationship between the evaluation assurance levels (EAL) and the assurance classes, families and components. The CC are published at https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/cc/ 24 / 26 BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 Certification Report D. Annexes List of annexes of this certification report Annex A: Security Target provided within a separate document. Annex B: Evaluation results regarding development and production environment 25 / 26 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 Annex B of Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0987-2019 Evaluation results regarding development and production environment The IT product Machine Readable e-Document with ICAO Application, Basic Access Control based on National Operating System (NOS), NOS e-Passport (BAC) v.1.01-I (Tar- get of Evaluation, TOE) has been evaluated at an approved evaluation facility using the Common Methodology for IT Security Evaluation (CEM), Version 3.1 extended by Scheme Interpretations and CC Supporting Documents for conformance to the Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation (CC), Version 3.1. As a result of the TOE certification, dated 29 March 2019, the following results regarding the development and production environment apply. The Common Criteria assurance requirements ALC – Life cycle support are fulfilled for the development and production sites of the TOE listed below: a) SW development and test site (“UniTech”): Universal Information Technologies LLC, 55 Chervonoarmiyska Str. ,Kyiv, 03150, Ukraine b) Integration/Production/Personalisation site: Polygraph Combine “Ukraina” (“PCU”), 38-44 Dehtiarivska Str., Kyiv, 04119, Ukraine c) For development and production sites regarding the platform please refer to the certification reports BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V3-2017 for Infineon Security Controller M7892 B11 from Infineon Technologies AG [15] For the sites listed above, the requirements have been specifically applied in accordance with the Security Target [6]. The evaluators verified, that the threats, security objectives and requirements for the TOE life cycle phases up to delivery (as stated in the Security Target [6]) are fulfilled by the procedures of these sites. Note: End of report 26 / 26